Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;13:1039375. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039375

Table 3.

Tests of mediation for cognitive evaluation.

Path Effect SE 95% CI
Indirect effect
IND1: PFP → PR → TP −0.02** 0.00 [−0.02, −0.01]
IND2: PFP → PR → CP −0.01** 0.00 [−0.01, −0.00]
IND3: PFP → IM → TP 0.05** 0.00 [0.04, 0.06]
IND4: PFP → IM → CP 0.04** 0.00 [0.03, 0.05]
Indirect effect difference
IND1-IND3: PFP → PR → TP- PFP → IM → TP −0.06** 0.01 [−0.07, −0.05]
IND2-IND4: PFP → PR → CP- PFP → IM → CP −0.05** 0.00 [−0.06, −0.04]
Direct effect
PFP → TP 0.23** 0.01 [0.21, 0.26]
PFP → CP 0.14** 0.01 [0.11, 0.16]
Total effect
PFP → TP 0.26** 0.01 [0.24, 0.29]
PFP → CP 0.17** 0.01 [0.14, 0.20]

PFP, pay for performance; PR, pressure; IM, intrinsic motivation; TP, task performance; CP, contextual performance.

Estimates were tested for significance using bias-corrected confidence intervals from 20,000 resamples through the R program.

N = 6,054. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.