Table 5.

Tests of mediation for justice.

Path	Effect	SE	95% CI
Indirect effect
IND1: PFP → DJ → TP	0.11**	0.01	[0.10, 0.13]
IND2: PFP → DJ → CP	0.01	0.00	[−0.00, 0.01]
IND3: PFP → PJ → TP	0.02**	0.01	[0.01, 0.03]
IND4: PFP → PJ → CP	0.07**	0.01	[0.06, 0.09]
Indirect effect difference
IND1-IND3: PFP → DJ → TP- PFP → PJ → TP	0.09**	0.01	[0.08, 0.11]
IND2-IND4: PFP → DJ → CP- PFP → PJ → CP	−0.07**	0.01	[−0.08, −0.05]
Direct effect
PFP → TP	0.13**	0.01	[0.10, 0.16]
PFP → CP	0.07**	0.02	[0.04, 0.10]
Total effect
PFP → TP	0.26**	0.02	[0.22, 0.29]
PFP → CP	0.15**	0.02	[0.12, 0.19]

PFP, pay for performance; DJ, distributive justice; PJ, procedural justice; TP, task performance; CP, contextual performance.

Estimates were tested for significance using bias-corrected confidence intervals from 20,000 resamples through the R program.

N = 4,401. ^*p < 0.05, ^**p < 0.01.