Ashanti, Owabide (Ghana) |
Angstrom-Prescott and Hargreaves and Samani |
Sunshine hours and air temperature |
Global solar radiation |
Five months from 2011: April, May, June, October, November |
MBE, MPE, and RMSE |
Proposed models using sunshine hours and air temperature compatible with measured solar radiation value. |
[26] |
Ghardaïa, Algeria |
6 combined new models |
Minimum and maximum temperature |
Global solar radiation |
365 days of 2006 |
RMSE, MBE, MAE, and MPE |
GSR predicted well in all models, and MPE values found ±10%. |
[27] |
Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico |
A novel empirical model (M5) |
Average relative humidity, minimum temperature, maximum temperature, and transformed rainfall |
Daily horizontal global solar radiation |
From 6 different stations on different dates between 2000 and 2014. |
MPE, MAPE, RMSE, MBE, MABE, and R2
|
The proposed model (M5) was calibrated using 12 existing models. If rainfall and relative humidity data are available, this model can be used. |
[28] |
India |
32 empirical models in 4 different categories |
Relative sunshine period, and clearness index |
Global solar energy |
1986–2000 |
MARE, MAE, RRMSE, RMSE, U95, t-stats, MPE, MBE, erMAX, r, and GPI |
The power model with a clearness index shows great performance. |
[29] |
Tropical regions of China |
6 temperature-based models (P1–P6) |
Temperature, relative air humidity, vapor pressure deficit, transformed precipitation, and precipitation |
Daily horizontal global solar radiation |
1966–2015 |
R2, RMSE, NRMSE, and MBE |
The second model (P2) has high accuracy when only air temperature is considered, but models 3 and 5 (P3 and P5) have higher accuracy when other variables (eg. precipitation and relative humidity) are considered for tropical regions of China. |
[30] |
Muğla, Türkiye |
105 different regression models and set of new regression models |
Sunshine duration, cloudless, and average sunshine duration |
Global horizontal solar radiation |
January 2007 to August 2015 |
MPE, MBE, MAPE, MABE, RMSE, and R2
|
7 new calibrated models were tested and found low error rates. |
[31] |
China |
72 existing and developed empirical models |
Meteorological and solar radiation data |
Diffuse horizontal solar radiation |
1966–2015 |
R2, RMSE, RRMSE, MAB, NRMSE, t-stat, U95, and GPI |
In different categories, models were tested and developed. |
[32] |
India |
Three Global Solar Radiation models (M-01, M-02, M-03) |
Relative humidity, latitude, altitude, and sunshine duration |
Global solar radiation |
1986–2000 |
RMSE, MAE, R2, MPE, RMSRE MARE, MBE, t-stat, GPI, RRMSE, and U95 |
M-03 model contains 4 variables and can be applied with maximum 11.8935% MPE. |
[33] |
Morocco |
Hybrid temperature-based models |
Temperature |
Daily global solar radiation |
1996–2010 |
MBE, MSE, RMSE, R2, standard deviation, and performance score |
4 ML models were used to optimize 42 temperature-based models and correlations (R2) increase. |
[34] |
China |
Zone model |
Surface meteorological measurements. |
Daily global solar radiation |
1970–2017 |
MABE, RMSE, and NSEC |
With the zone method NSEC values greater than 0.8 and RMSE% less than 20% obtained. |
[35] |
Iran |
Twenty-one sunshine-based empirical models |
Number of days and sunshine |
Daily solar radiation |
2007–2017 |
R2, MAE, MBE, RRMSE, MAPE, RMSE, and MBE |
21 different sunshine-based empirical models were compared and calibrated. |
[36] |
Adrar, Algeria |
Proposed 6 temperature-based models |
Daily air temperature |
Daily average horizontal global solar radiation |
4 years period |
MBE, RMSE, and R2
|
Proposed M4 model shows best performance (R2 = 0.87). |
[37] |
Industrial City, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia |
Linear, Quadratic and Logarithmic |
Relative humidity, ambient temperature, and sunshine duration |
Global horizontal radiation |
January–December 2016 |
r, R2, RMSE, MBE, MABE, and MAPE |
3 different models were examined and compared, the quadratic model has the highest r and R2. |
[38] |
Eskişehir, Türkiye |
Angström-Prescott model and improved versions of this model, also several typical models based on ambient temperature |
Sun radiation, sunshine period, temperature, air pressure, wind speed, and relative humidity |
Worldwide sun radiation |
January 2011–December 2014 |
E, MPE, MAPE, SSRE, RSE, MBE, RMSE, t-sat, and R2
|
The author tested new model usage with 9 statistical techniques. |
[39] |
Peru |
Multiple linear regression analysis |
Temperature, precipitation, and relative humidity |
Daily solar radiation |
1990–2004 (calibration) and 2004–2010 (validation) |
RMSE |
Seven empirical models were employed for the prediction of daily solar radiation data. |
[40] |
Morroco |
Temperature -Geographic factors model |
Temperature- Geographic factors |
Global solar radiation |
August 2011–September 2015 |
r, nMAE, and nRMSE |
22 empirical models and other machine learning methods were applied. Temperature-Geographic factors models recommend in all empirical models. |
[41] |
Iran |
11 Newly Developed Empirical Models (NDEM) |
Month number, solar declination, sunshine duration, RH, and cloud cover rank |
Monthly, daily, and hourly diffuse solar radiation |
January 2008 to December 2017 |
RMSE, NRMSE, and R2
|
11 newly developed models were tested. Errors do not exceed 10% for these models. |
[42] |
Ghana |
Modified Angström-Prescot, modified Steyn-method, Ordinary kriging method |
Sunshine duration |
Global solar radiation, sky view factor, cloudiness index |
2015–2018 |
r |
Sky conditions were calculated by different methods for the 4 climate regions of Ghana. |
[43] |
China |
Empirical PV power model, combined a sunshine-based model, and inverse distance weighting model |
Minimum and maximum temperature, sunshine duration, relative humidity, and precipitation |
Global solar radiation |
1961 to 2018 |
RMSE, MAE, RRMSE, R2, and NS |
New developed global solar radiation model can predict correctly. |
[44] |
Fiji island |
20 empirical models |
Sunshine duration, minimum, mean, and maximum temperatures, cloud cover, and relative humidity |
Global solar radiation |
1984 to 2018 |
ME, NSE, PME, RMSE, and r-value |
20 models were analyzed by dividing into 3 different groups. Models with relative humidity in group 3 performed very well. |
[45] |
Irani (Ahvaz, BandarAbbas, and Kermanshah) |
Eight Rs empirical models, (AP, GG, HS, S, An, Ch, Ba, Ab) |
Extraterrestrial solar radiation, sunshine hours, air temperature, relative humidity, maximum possible sunshine hours, the function of daily range of air temperature, and station altitude |
Solar radiation |
2007 to 2017 |
RMSE, NMRSE, and R2
|
They compared 8 empirical models and SVM models. They do not recommend the use of empirical models instead of the SVM model, despite their high accuracy. |
[46] |