Table 4.
Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and BZD Use Outcomes
Linear Regression: BZD Dependence Severity | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t | p | ΔR 2 | p for ΔR 2 | |
Step 1 | .115 | <.001** | |||
Sex | .036 | .660 | .510 | ||
Age | .031 | .563 | .574 | ||
Race | .128 | 2.340 | .020* | ||
Education | .294 | 5.369 | < .001** | ||
Step 2 | .442 | <.001** | |||
Pain Intensitya | .290 | 6.526 | < .001** | ||
Pain Catastrophizingb | .506 | 11.517 | < .001** | ||
Step 3 | .001 | .418 | |||
Pain Intensity × Pain Catastrophizing | −.181 | −.812 | .418 | ||
Linear Regression: Past-Month BZD Use Frequency | |||||
β | t | p | ΔR 2 | p for ΔR 2 | |
Step 1 | .058 | .001* | |||
Sex | −.039 | −.687 | .493 | ||
Age | −.051 | −.911 | .363 | ||
Race | −.166 | −2.946 | .003* | ||
Education | −.142 | −2.519 | .012* | ||
Step 2 | .036 | 003* | |||
Pain Intensitya | .208 | 3.267 | .001* | ||
Pain Catastrophizingb | −.151 | −2.411 | .016* | ||
Step 3 | .007 | .142 | |||
Pain Intensity × Pain Catastrophizing | −.469 | −1.471 | .142 | ||
Logistic Regression: Likelihood of BZD Misuse | |||||
Variable | B | SE | AOR | 95% CI | p |
Step 1 | |||||
Sex | −.871 | .356 | .418 | .208–.841 | .015* |
Age | −.011 | .015 | .989 | .960–1.019 | .454 |
Race | −.548 | .435 | .578 | .246–1.356 | .208 |
Education | .864 | .168 | 2.373 | 1.707–3.299 | < .001** |
Step 2 | |||||
Pain Intensitya | .107 | .054 | 1.113 | 1.002–1.237 | .046* |
Pain Catastrophizingb | .115 | .023 | 1.122 | 1.072–1.174 | < .001** |
Step 3 | |||||
Pain Intensity × Pain Catastrophizing | .008 | .005 | 1.008 | .999–1.017 | .093 |
Note: N = 306. Linear regression: β = standardized beta weights. Logistic regression: Results shown are from the second step of the logistic regression model. Sex: Reference group = female; Race: Reference group = White;
Graded Chronic Pain Scale – Characteristic Pain Intensity;
Pain Catastrophizing Scale total score;
p < .05;
p < .001.