Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain. 2022 Oct 12;24(2):345–355. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.09.019

Table 4.

Pain Intensity, Pain Catastrophizing, and BZD Use Outcomes

Linear Regression: BZD Dependence Severity
β t p ΔR 2 p for ΔR 2
Step 1 .115 <.001**
 Sex .036 .660 .510
 Age .031 .563 .574
 Race .128 2.340 .020*
 Education .294 5.369 < .001**
Step 2 .442 <.001**
 Pain Intensitya .290 6.526 < .001**
 Pain Catastrophizingb .506 11.517 < .001**
Step 3 .001 .418
 Pain Intensity × Pain Catastrophizing −.181 −.812 .418
Linear Regression: Past-Month BZD Use Frequency
β t p ΔR 2 p for ΔR 2
Step 1 .058 .001*
 Sex −.039 −.687 .493
 Age −.051 −.911 .363
 Race −.166 −2.946 .003*
 Education −.142 −2.519 .012*
Step 2 .036 003*
 Pain Intensitya .208 3.267 .001*
 Pain Catastrophizingb −.151 −2.411 .016*
Step 3 .007 .142
 Pain Intensity × Pain Catastrophizing −.469 −1.471 .142
Logistic Regression: Likelihood of BZD Misuse
Variable B SE AOR 95% CI p
Step 1
 Sex −.871 .356 .418 .208–.841 .015*
 Age −.011 .015 .989 .960–1.019 .454
 Race −.548 .435 .578 .246–1.356 .208
 Education .864 .168 2.373 1.707–3.299 < .001**
Step 2
 Pain Intensitya .107 .054 1.113 1.002–1.237 .046*
 Pain Catastrophizingb .115 .023 1.122 1.072–1.174 < .001**
Step 3
 Pain Intensity × Pain Catastrophizing .008 .005 1.008 .999–1.017 .093

Note: N = 306. Linear regression: β = standardized beta weights. Logistic regression: Results shown are from the second step of the logistic regression model. Sex: Reference group = female; Race: Reference group = White;

a

Graded Chronic Pain Scale – Characteristic Pain Intensity;

b

Pain Catastrophizing Scale total score;

*

p < .05;

**

p < .001.