Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Dec 28;38(2):261–277. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4757

Table 3.

Comparisons of nanoindentation outcomes (mean ± standard deviation) in NGT and T2DM groups in cortical and trabecular bone stratified by tissue region.

Parameter NGT T2DM % difference vs.
NGT
p-value (NGT vs.
T2DM)
Indentation Modulus (GPa)
Cortical bone 15.4 ± 3.18 16.8 ± 3.16 9 0.021
Osteonal bone 15.2 ± 3.22 16.3 ± 3.15 7 0.252
Interstitial bone 15.5 ± 3.06 17.3 ± 3.10 12 0.035
Trabecular bone 14.3 ± 2.87 14.0 ± 2.71 −2 0.482
Label 13.0 ± 2.96 12.7 ± 2.36 −2 0.992
Edge 14.5 ± 2.80 13.9 ± 2.70 −4 0.921
Center 15.5 ± 2.46 15.3 ± 2.42 −1 0.999
Hardness (GPa)
Cortical bone 0.498 ± 0.0997 0.538 ± 0.107 8 0.039
Osteonal bone 0.497 ± 0.105 0.526 ± 0.107 6 0.434
Interstitial bone 0.498 ± 0.0815 0.551 ± 0.106 11 0.062
Trabecular bone 0.495 ± 0.0934 0.480 ± 0.0931 −3 0.473
Label 0.482 ± 0.108 0.471 ± 0.0916 −2 0.995
Edge 0.486 ± 0.0875 0.462 ± 0.0913 −5 0.862
Center 0.516 ± 0.0848 0.509 ± 0.0902 −1 0.999