Table 6.
ps,fin that predicted by the CCM and 3D numerical modelling with different analysis cases.
| ps,fin/MPa | Rigid liner (ts = 0.21 m, Es = 30 GPa) | Fexible liner (ts = 0.18 m, Es = 20 GPa) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSI = 20 | GSI = 35 | GSI = 50 | GSI = 20 | GSI = 35 | GSI = 50 | ||
| σ0 = 25 MPa | CCM | 3.70 | 6.45 | 3.92 | 3.68 | 5.31 | 2.63 |
| 3D modelling | 10.58 | 6.56 | 2.67 | 9.57 | 5.01 | 1.76 | |
| σ0 = 20 MPa | CCM | 4.07 | 5.26 | 3.13 | 4.02 | 4.23 | 2.07 |
| 3D modelling | 8.19 | 5.06 | 2.10 | 7.38 | 3.78 | 1.31 | |
| σ0 = 15 MPa | CCM | 3.53 | 4.05 | 2.35 | 3.45 | 3.16 | 1.52 |
| 3D modelling | 5.96 | 3.72 | 1.55 | 5.27 | 2.68 | 0.96 | |
| σ0 = 10 MPa | CCM | 2.60 | 2.82 | 1.60 | 2.50 | 2.11 | 1.01 |
| 3D modelling | 3.84 | 2.39 | 1.03 | 3.38 | 1.67 | 0.63 | |
| σ0 = 5 MPa | CCM | 1.54 | 1.56 | 0.82 | 1.42 | 1.09 | 0.51 |
| 3D modelling | 2.03 | 1.15 | 0.51 | 1.73 | 0.78 | 0.31 | |