Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;14(2):80. doi: 10.1038/s41419-023-05628-z

Table 1.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of overall survival in breast cancer patients.

Characteristics Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Hazard ratio (95% CI) p value Hazard ratio (95% CI) p value
Pathologic stage (II + III + IV versus I) 2.210 (1.313–3.721) 0.003 1.925 (1.047–3.542) 0.035
Tumor size (T3 + T4 versus T1 + T2) 1.608 (1.110–2.329) 0.012 1.332 (0.827–2.147) 0.238
Lymph node metastasis (N2-3 versus N0-1) 2.163 (1.472–3.180) <0.001 1.992 (1.211–3.277) 0.007
M stage (M1 versus M0) 4.254 (2.468–7.334) <0.001 2.114 (0.970–4.607) 0.060
Race (White versus Asian) 1.325 (0.420–4.186) 0.631
Race (Black + African American versus Asian) 1.525 (0.463–5.024) 0.488
Histological type (ILC versus IDC) 0.827 (0.526–1.299) 0.410
ER status (Positive versus Negative) 0.725 (0.505–1.041) 0.082 0.623 (0.310–1.250) 0.183
PR status (Positive versus Negative) 0.733 (0.525–1.025) 0.070 0.780 (0.413–1.474) 0.445
Age (>60 versus ≤60) 2.020 (1.465–2.784) <0.001 2.174 (1.475–3.205) <0.001
PAM50 (LumB versus LumA) 1.663 (1.088–2.541) 0.019 1.080 (0.653–1.787) 0.765
PAM50 (Her2 versus LumA) 2.261 (1.325–3.859) 0.003 1.287 (0.585–2.831) 0.530
PAM50 (Basal versus LumA) 1.285 (0.833–1.981) 0.257 0.845 (0.394–1.809) 0.664
TMEM105 expression (high versus low) 1.575 (1.138–2.180) 0.006 1.483 (1.005–2.186) 0.047