Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 11;102(4):102473. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.102473

Table 4.

Effect of Bacillus subtilis and its delivery routes on relative weight of immune organs and serum immunoglobulin concentrations in broiler chickens.

Parameters Treatments1
SEM2 P value3
Negative control In-feed antibiotic In-feed probiotic In ovo probiotic 1 In ovo probiotic 2
Bursa weight (g/Kg BW) 1.81 1.80 1.64 1.76 1.93 0.06 0.645
Spleen weight (g/Kg BW) 0.70 0.76 0.73 0.73 0.69 0.02 0.920
Immunoglobulin G (Mg/mL) 10.3a 4.75ab 2.71bc 0.96cd 0.06d 0.31 <0.001
Immunoglobulin M (Mg/mL) 2.37 0.61 0.35 0.19 0.15 0.05 0.333
1

Treatments include— (1) Negative Control treatment- chicks fed a basal corn-soybean meal-wheat–based diet; (2) In-feed antibiotics- chicks fed NC + 0.05% bacitracin methylene disalicylate; (3) In-feed probiotics- chicks fed NC + 0.005% Bacillus subtilis containing 1 × 108 CFU/kg of feed; (4) In ovo probiotics group 1- eggs injected with 10 × 106 CFU of Bacillus subtilis fermentation extract/0.2 mL saline diluent; and (5) In ovo probiotics group 2- eggs injected with 20 × 106 CFU of Bacillus subtilis fermentation extract/0.2 mL saline diluent.

2

SEM = Standard error of means.

3

Means within a row with different superscripts.

a,b,c,d

Significantly differ.