Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 3;13:1997. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29025-w

Table 2.

Comparison results of transcript sequencing data.

Species Sample abbreviation Total pairs Mapped reads Concordant pairs
Grape C_G_t1 15 933 645 82.80% 77.60%
C_G_t2 29 858 769 79.30% 73.80%
C_G_t3 22 781 342 76.60% 70.60%
C_G_leaf 25 566 026 75.60% 70.60%
W_G_t1 17 098 859 73.00% 63.40%
W_G_t2 26 403 616 68.90% 59.50%
W_G_t3 23 370 214 69.90% 60.60%
W_G_leaf 25 119 641 62.40% 54.70%
Peach C_P_t1 24 512 137 85.20% 81.00%
C_P_t2 17 326 896 88.20% 84.20%
C_P_t3 30 382 911 88.10% 84.40%
C_P_leaf 16 055 962 87.60% 83.60%
W_P_t1 15 770 694 86.50% 82.20%
W_P_t2 17 409 126 88.20% 84.20%
W_P_t3 29 320 743 87.10% 84.30%
W_P_leaf 26 376 610 85.80% 81.50%