Table 2.
Results and scores 6 months at the last follow-up
| N | KT 1000 side-to-side |
Lysholm Score | Subjective IKDC | Objective IKDC | KOOS | Lachman test | Pivot Shift test | Howell grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 mm | 97 | 94 | A | 97% | Grade 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | 4 mm | 96 | 95 | B | 98% | Grade I | 1 | 2 |
| 3 | 1 mm | 99 | 94 | A | 95% | Grade 0 | 0 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 mm | 90 | 90 | A | 96% | Grade 0 | 1 | 2 |
| 5 | 2 mm | 100 | 98 | A | 97% | Grade 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 6 | 3 mm | 98 | 89 | B | 94% | Grade I | 0 | 1 |
Lachman test was graded as suggested by Hurley et al. [26]: Grade 0, Tight with firm end-feel; Grade I, Nominal increase in laxity compared to contralateral knee; Grade II, Slight increase in anterior translation compared to contralateral knee; Grade III, Excessive anterior translation compared to contralateral knee.
Pivot shift test was graded as 0, absence; 1 + , glide; 2 + , clunk; 3 + , gross