Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):1–244.

Table 10:

Volume of Thrombolytic Infusion With Mechanical Thrombectomy Use in Arterial Acute Limb Ischemia

Author, year Outcome measurement Results P value
MT Comparator
PMT (AngioJet)
de Athayde Soares et al, 202077 Unfractionated heparin use postoperatively NR NR P = .15
IV prostavasin 11% (2) 6% (2) P = .40
Gong et al, 20211
Included large bore catheters, AngioJet, and Rotarex]
Mean rtPA dose 14.14 mg (SD ± 5.75) 29.27 mg (SD ± 11.70) P = .000
Vacuum Aspiration (Indigo)
No studies met our inclusion criteria for this mechanical thrombectomy device
Rotational (Rotarex)
Gong et al, 2021,1 included large bore catheters, AngioJet, and Rotarex (see findings discussed elsewhere in this assessment)a
Muli Jogi et al, 2018,82 included both AngioJet and Rotarex (see findings discussed elsewhere in this assessment)a
Puangpunngam et al, 202083 Dose of rtPA 0 30 mg P = .001
Ultrasound Assisted (EKOS)
Chait et al, 201974,c Mean volume of tPA administered 48.2 mg 44.6 mg P = .6
Schernthaner et al, 201484 Median total rtPA lytic dose 8.4 mg (IQR: 4.9-13.2) 6.8 (IQR: 5.8-11.1) P = .479

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; NR, not reported; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; SD, standard deviation.

a

Gong et al1 compared treatment groups of large bore catheters versus AngioJet versus Rotarex.

b

Muli Jogi et al, 201882 compared catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet and Rotarex.

c

While all patients in both groups also received AngioJet, the study design isolated the effect of EKOS.