Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):1–244.

Table 15:

Post-Thrombotic Syndrome With Mechanical Thrombectomy Use in Acute and Subacute DVT in Randomized Controlled Trials

Results
Author, year Outcome measurement MT Comparator P value
PMT (AngioJet)
ATTRACT trial92
PMT vs. control (no procedure, anticoagulation alone)
Proportion with post-thrombotic syndrome, 24 mo 44.0% (n = 33) 41.4% (n = 79) P = .69
Iliofemoral subgroupa 28.1% (n = 9) 30.3% (n = 20) P = .82
Popliteal subgroupa 37.9% (n = 11) 42.9% (n = 39) P = .64
Vacuum Aspiration (Indigo)
No randomized studies met our inclusion criteria for this mechanical thrombectomy device
Rotational (Rotarex or Cleaner)
No randomized controlled trials met our conclusion criteria for this mechanical thrombectomy device
Ultrasound Assisted (EKOS)
Engelberger et al, 20152 Mean Villalta score 3.0 (SD ± 3.9) 1.9 (SD ± 1.9) P = .21
CAVA trial, Notton et al, 20203,102 Proportion of patients with post-thrombotic syndrome, at final visit, by Villalta score 30.6% (n = 19) 44.8% (n = 26) P = .11

Abbreviations: ATTRACT, Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; SD, standard deviation.

a

Per protocol analysis.