Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 24;23(1):1–244.

Table 17:

Technical Success With Mechanical Thrombectomy Use in Acute and Subacute DVT in Randomized Controlled Trials

Results
Author, year Outcome measurement MT Comparator P value
PMT (AngioJet)
ATTRACT trial89,92 (PMT vs. infusion first rtPA) Post-procedure thrombus score 1.7 (SD ± 2.8) 3.1 (SD ± 4.0) P = .001
Thrombus score change from baseline 6.7 (SD ± 4.5) 9.8 (SD ± 6.3) P < .001
Proportion with clot lysis > 90% 75% (n = 56) 72% (n = 138) P = .64
Vacuum Aspiration (Indigo)
No randomized studies met our inclusion criteria for this mechanical thrombectomy device
Rotational (Rotarex or Cleaner)
No randomized controlled trials met our inclusion criteria for this mechanical thrombectomy device
Ultrasound Assisted (EKOS)
Engelberger et al, 20152 Length-adjusted thrombus score at 15 ha 27 (SD ± 24) 25 (SD ± 16) P = .68
Mean percentage of thrombus reduction at 15 h 55% (SD ± 27%) 54% (SD ± 27%) P = .91
Proportion of patients who had a thrombus load reduction ≥ 50% 58% (n = 14) 63% (n =15) P > .99

Abbreviations: ATTRACT, Acute Venous Thrombosis: Thrombus Removal with Adjunctive Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; MT, mechanical thrombectomy; PMT, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy; SD, standard deviation.

a

A measure of thrombus size. Lower scores indicate clear vessel segments. Baseline scores were similar (P = .86) between study groups. Both groups showed statistically significant improvement (P < .01) from baseline.