Table 51:
Budget Impact Analysis Results for Adults Hospitalized Due to Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis, Sensitivity Analyses
| Scenario | Budget impact, in millions (2022 CAD)a,b,c | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year 1 | Year 2 | Year 3 | Year 4 | Year 5 | Total | |
| Reference case | ||||||
| Budget impact | 0.77 | 0.93 | 1.10 | 1.27 | 1.44 | 5.52 |
| 1. Including only the costs of disposable devices for MT | ||||||
| Budget impact | 0.39 | 0.47 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 0.74 | 2.82 |
| 2. Considering MT only as the alternative of CDT | ||||||
| Budget impact | -0.11 | -0.13 | -0.14 | -0.16 | -0.18 | -0.72 |
| 3. Target population 20% larger than the reference case | ||||||
| Budget impact | 0.92 | 1.12 | 1.32 | 1.53 | 1.73 | 6.62 |
| 4. Costs of disposable devices 25% lower than the reference case | ||||||
| Budget impact | 0.67 | 0.82 | 0.96 | 1.11 | 1.26 | 4.81 |
| 5-1. Cost savings of ICU and ward stay of MT treatment 25% higher than the reference case | ||||||
| Budget impact | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0.88 | 1.01 | 1.15 | 4.39 |
| 5-2. Cost savings of ICU and ward stay of MT treatment 25% lower than the reference case | ||||||
| Budget impact | 0.93 | 1.13 | 1.33 | 1.53 | 1.74 | 6.65 |
Abbreviations: CDT, catheter-directed treatment; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; ICU, Intensive care unit; MT, mechanical thrombectomy.
a
Negative costs indicate savings.
b
Some numbers may appear inexact due to rounding.
c
If a hospital purchases equipment for MT, the equipment can be used for both populations—arterial acute limb ischemia and acute DVT. Since we included the scenario of additional purchases of equipment for MT treatment in next 5 years in the sensitivity analysis of arterial acute limb ischemia (Table 50), we did not include it in this table.