Table 5.
Prediction of Cognitive Performance and Absolute Value Introspective Accuracy by the Longitudinal Occurrence of Psychotic Symptoms Measured with EMA.
| Absolute Value IA | Absolute Value IA Adjusted for Cognition |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Variable | X 2 | df | p | X 2 | df | p |
| Omnibus | 201.32 | 34 | < .001 | 489.92 | 34 | < .001 |
| Intercept | 12595.70 | 1 | < .001 | 11658.74 | 1 | < .001 |
| Hallucinations | 38.04 | 1 | < .001 | 44.30 | 1 | < .001 |
| Paranoia | 90.18 | 1 | < .001 | 49.85 | 1 | < .001 |
| Other Delusions | 187.03 | 1 | < .001 | 161.37 | 1 | < .001 |
| Composite Cognition | - | - | - | 293.72 | 1 | < .001 |
| Adjusted Means for Absolute Value IA. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| EM Mean | SEM | ||
| Hallucinations | Y | 0.51 | 0.01 |
| N | 0.45 | 0.01 | |
| Paranoia | Y | 0.51 | 0.01 |
| N | 0.44 | 0.01 | |
| Other Delusions | Y | 0.55 | 0.01 |
| N | 0.41 | 0.01 | |
Note. IA = Introspective accuracy.