Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 14;45(2):101–119. doi: 10.1007/s00276-022-03061-z

Table 4.

Distance between the greater palatine foramen and surrounding anatomical landmarks

Total number of studies Total number of subjects Pooled mean
(95% CI) [mm]
Cochrane’s Q I2 (95% CI) [%] p value
GPF–PNSa 8 2358 17.21 (16.34–18.09) 345.96 98.0 (97.2–98.6) p < 0.0001
Asia 4 380 17.06 (15.57–18.56) 198.31 98.5 (97.6–99.0) p < 0.0001
Europe 2 1450 18.04 (15.94–20.15) 105.84 99.1 (98.2–99.5) p < 0.0001
GPF–PBHP 24 4349 2.56 (1.90–3.22) 276,374.89 100.0 p = 0
Africa 2 465 3.71 (0.83–6.59) 43.02 97.7 (94.3–99.0) p < 0.0001
Asia 17 2030 4.16 (3.17–5.15) 262,382.79 100.0 p = 0
Europe 3 1600 4.18 (1.83–6.54) 79.92 97.5 (95.1–98.7) p < 0.0001
South America 2 254 3.41 (0.53–6.30) 0.11 0.0 p = 0.74
GPF–ANSb 4 365 46.24 (44.30–48.18) 90.68 96.7 (94.1–98.2) p < 0.0001
GPF–MMS 38 5379 15.22 (15.00–15.43) 10,090.72 99.6 (99.6–99.7) p = 0
Africa 3 565 15.13 (14.36–15.89) 42.13 95.3 (89.4–97.9) p = 0.075
Asia 26 2506 15.14 (14.88–15.40) 9776.26 99.7 (99.7–99.8) p = 0
Europe 4 1773 15.76 (15.10–16.42) 68.67 95.6 (91.7–97.7) p < 0.0001
South America 5 535 15.21 (14.61–15.81) 56.23 92.9 (86.4–96.3) p < 0.0001
GPF–IF 23 4404 37.32 (36.19–38.45) 3837.15 99.4 (99.4–99.5) p = 0
Africa 2 520 38.23 (37.70–38.75) 2.68 62.6 (62.5–62.6) p < 0.0001
Asia 16 2113 36.87 (35.51–38.22) 2078.70 99.3 (99.0–99.5) p < 0.0001
Europe 2 1450 36.79 (31.69–41.89) 353.06 99.7 (99.6–99.8) p < 0.0001
South America 3 321 39.47 (35.81–43.12) 173.63 98.8 (98.1–99.3) p < 0.0001

CI confidence interval, GPF greater palatine foramen, PNS posterior nasal spine, PBHP posterior border of hard palate, ANS anterior nasal spine, MMS midline maxillary suture, IF incisive foramen

aTwo studies [8, 63] were excluded from the subgroup analysis due to being the only studies in their own respective subgroups

bSubgroup analysis for GPF–ANS was not performed due to the low number of studies