Table 2.
CGM aspects investigated | RATING/5 n (%) (total n = 70) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
General acceptability | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3%) | 11 (16%) | 57 (81%) |
(comparison with OGTT (n = 60)) | 3 (5%) | 9 (15%) | 16 (27%) | 16 (27%) | 16 (27%) |
Insertion | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (3%) | 10 (14%) | 58 (83%) |
Wearing | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (6%) | 9 (13%) | 57 (81%) |
Removal | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (9%) | 13 (19%) | 51 (73%) |
Likelihood of recommending it to other women | 0 (0%) | 1 (1%) | 4 (6%) | 9 (13%) | 56 (80%) |
(comparison with OGTT (n = 60)) | 15 (25%) | 13 (22%) | 17 (28%) | 8 (13%) | 7 (12%) |
CGM Continuous glucose monitoring