Skip to main content
. 2021 May 18;53(2):419–428. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721001628

Table 2.

Treatment effect of evidence-based psychotherapy for PTSD in VHA

Treatment comparison Treatment effect in z-values (95% CI) Treatment effect in PCL-4 scale Between-group difference in percent change from baseline Between-group difference for percent recovereda (95% CI) Odds ratio for recoverya (95% CI)
CPT initiator v. non-EBP initiator −0.36 (−0.44 to −0.28) −4.8 (−5.8, 3.7) −7.3 (−10.1, −4.5) 7.4 (5.4–9.5) 2.6 (2.0–3.4)
Complete 8 + CPT v. Complete 8 + non-EBP −0.49 (−0.75 to −0.23) −6.4 (−10.0, −3.1) −17.0 (−22.9, −11.1) 11.9 (7.7–16.2) 8.7 (3.7–20.8)
PE initiator v. Non-EBP initiator −0.23 (−0.36 to −0.10) −3.0 (−4.8, −1.3) −5.2 (−9.0, −1.4) 5.5 (2.5–8.5) 2.2 (1.4–3.3)
Complete PE 8 +  Complete 8 + non-EBP −0.73 (−1.04 to −0.41) −9.7 (−13.8, −5.4) −14.5 (−21.5, −7.6) 2.8 (−2.1–7.6) 1.9 (0.6–6.2)
PE initiator v. CPT initiator 0.05 (−0.11 to 0.22) 0.6 (−1.5, 2.9) 0.4 (−4.1, 4.8) 1.8 (−2.1–5.8) 1.2 (0.8–1.8)
Complete 8 + PE Complete 8 + CPT −0.10 (−0.32 to 0.11) −1.3 (−4.2, 1.4) −4.1 (−11.4, 3.3) 5.1 (−3.0–13.2) 1.6 (0.8–3.0)
a

Recovery defined as having experienced a 10-point or greater improvement from baseline and follow-up PCL-4 score <39.

bEffect is the difference between propensity-score matched treatment and control group in the change in z-scored PCL (i.e. difference-in-difference), weighted by inverse probability of having follow-up PCL. The complete adherence effect additionally accounted for treatment switching or lack of adherence with inverse probability of censoring weights. A negative value means the treatment group had greater improvement (decrease) in symptoms than the control group, e.g. CPT completers had a 0.49 greater decrease in z-score (or, 6.4-points on the PCL-4 scale) compared to the non-EBP group. Note. Initiators are those receiving any individual therapy and completers are those receiving eight or more individual therapy sessions.