Table 3.
The significant stepwise regression models for the relationship between fruit frequency, savoury snacking and psychological health, including covariates (n 428)
| Depression | Exercise | Age | General health rating | Smoking status | Fruit frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unstandardised β | –0·003 | –0·050 | –0·507 | –0·519 | –0·188 |
| Standardised β | –0·112 | –0·180 | –0·128 | –0·112 | –0·109 |
| P | 0·021 | < 0·001 | 0·008 | 0·019 | 0·025 |
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | Step 5 | |
| R, R² | 0·164, 0·027 | 0·216, 0·047 | 0·262, 0·068 | 0·290, 0·084 | 0·308, 0·095 |
| R² change | 0·027 | 0·020 | 0·022 | 0·016 | 0·011 |
| Adjusted R² | 0·025 | 0·042 | 0·062 | 0·075 | 0·084 |
| Wellbeing | General health rating | Fruit frequency | Age | ||
| Unstandardised β | 2·888 | 0·916 | 0·110 | ||
| Standardised β | 0·255 | 0·187 | 0·140 | ||
| P | < 0·001 | < 0·001 | 0·003 | ||
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | |||
| R, R² | 0·254, 0·064 | 0·310, 0·096 | 0·340, 0·116 | ||
| R² change | 0·064 | 0·032 | 0·019 | ||
| Adjusted R² | 0·062 | 0·092 | 0·109 | ||
| Anxiety | Age | General health rating | Smoking status | Savoury snacking | Sex |
| Unstandardised β | –0·108 | –0·677 | –0·805 | 0·362 | 0·898 |
| Standardised β | –0·311 | –0·136 | –0·139 | 0·127 | 0·101 |
| P | < 0·001 | 0·003 | 0·002 | 0·005 | 0·029 |
| Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | Step 5 | |
| R, R² | 0·324, 0·105 | 0·361, 0·130 | 0·385, 0·148 | 0·403, 0·163 | 0·415, 0·172 |
| R² change | 0·105 | 0·025 | 0·018 | 0·014 | 0·010 |
| Adjusted R² | 0·103 | 0·126 | 0·142 | 0·155 | 0·162 |
Note: Depression: Step 1 exercise; Step 2 age was added; Step 3 general health rating added; Step 4 smoking status added; Step 5 fruit frequency added. Wellbeing: Step 1 general health rating; Step 2 fruit frequency was added; Step 3 age added. Anxiety: Step 1 age; Step 2 general health rating was added; Step 3 smoking status added; Step 4 savoury snacking added; Step 5 sex added.