RQ	Question	Objective	Methodology
1	To what extent are different case management tools or approaches effective at countering radicalisation to violence?	Synthesise evidence relating to outcomes capturing the effectiveness of a tool or approach at countering radicalisation to violence. This analysis examines:	Narrative summary of all included studies.
		(i) Primary outcomes (i.e., measures of disengagement, desistance, and deradicalisation); and	Meta‐analysis of experimental/stronger quasi‐experimental quantitative studies.
		(ii) Secondary outcomes (i.e., measures of client engagement or motivation; measures capturing attitudinal or behavioural changes relevant to primary outcomes).	Alternative synthesis of data not suitable for meta‐analysis using methods Cochrane deem to be acceptable (see Section 3.8.3).
2	(a) To what extent are different case management tools or approaches implemented as intended?	Synthesise evidence that captures how different tools and approaches are being implemented in practice.	Narrative summary of all studies (qualitative and quantitative)
	(b) What explains how different case management tools and approaches are implemented in practice?	Identify, and synthesise evidence relating to, the different implementation factors and/or moderators (Section 1.2.6) that:	Meta‐analysis of quantitative studies with experimental or stronger quasi‐experimental design.
		(i) influence how different tools and approaches are implemented on‐the‐ground; and	Alternative synthesis of data not suitable for meta‐analysis using methods Cochrane deem to be acceptable (see Section 3.8.3)
		(ii) explain whether these tools and approaches are being implemented in the way intended/expected.	Framework synthesis of qualitative data.