RQ	Question	Objective	Methodology
3	To what extent are different case management tools or approaches effective at countering interpersonal and collective forms of violence?	Synthesise evidence relating to different outcomes capturing the effectiveness of a tool or approach at countering violence. This analysis will examine both:	Narrative summary of evidence relating to each research question.
		(i) Primary outcomes (i.e., measures of disengagement/desistance); and
		(ii) Secondary outcomes (i.e., measures of client engagement or motivation; measures capturing attitudinal or behavioural changes relevant to primary outcomes).
4	(a) To what extent are different case management tools or approaches implemented as intended?	Synthesise evidence that captures how different tools and approaches are being implemented in practice.
	(b) What explains how different case management tools and approaches are implemented in practice?	Identify, and synthesise evidence relating to, the different implementation factors and/or moderators (Section 1.2.6) that:
		(i) influence how different tools and approaches are implemented on‐the‐ground; and
		(ii) explain whether these tools and approaches are being implemented in the way intended/expected.
5	Is there any evidence to suggest that these tools and approaches could be effective in countering radicalisation to violence?	Identify case management tools, methods and approaches used to counter other forms of violence which could potentially be adopted to counter radicalisation to violence by assessing the transferability of these interventions (see Section 4.8.2)