Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 6;80:102976. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2023.102976

Table 3.

Estimates in unadjusted and adjusted models predicting the difference in number of outlets.

Predictors Unadjusted model
Adjusted model
Estimate 95% CI p Estimate 95% CI p
Area deprivation
1 – least deprived 0 0
2 32.0 −50.4, 114.5 0.446 4.0 −38.4, 46.5 0.852
3 159.6 69.09, 250.1 0.001 −16.6 −60.4, 27.2 0.457
4 127.6 34.58, 220.7 0.007 −31.0 −73.4, 11.3 0.151
5 – most deprived −4.1 −69.0-60.9 0.902 −42.6 −86.9–1.7 0.059
Region – North of England −139.0 −201.2, −76.8 <0.001
Urban status - urban −34.5 −57.8, −11.2 0.004
Population density 7.3 5.5, 9.1 <0.001
Gender (% male) 5.4 −15.1, 25.9 0.604
Age (% 25–34 years) 2.9 −2.1, 7.9 0.260
Ethnicity (% non-White)



−1.3
−3.2, 0.5
0.164
Observations 661 661
R2/R2 adjusted 0.032/0.026 0.777/0.774

Population density was scaled to reflect a unit change of 100 people per km2. Brackets following variable names provide further information on the measure such as units.