Table 3.
Predictors | Unadjusted model |
Adjusted model |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Estimate | 95% CI | p | Estimate | 95% CI | p | |
Area deprivation | ||||||
1 – least deprived | 0 | 0 | ||||
2 | 32.0 | −50.4, 114.5 | 0.446 | 4.0 | −38.4, 46.5 | 0.852 |
3 | 159.6 | 69.09, 250.1 | 0.001 | −16.6 | −60.4, 27.2 | 0.457 |
4 | 127.6 | 34.58, 220.7 | 0.007 | −31.0 | −73.4, 11.3 | 0.151 |
5 – most deprived | −4.1 | −69.0-60.9 | 0.902 | −42.6 | −86.9–1.7 | 0.059 |
Region – North of England | −139.0 | −201.2, −76.8 | <0.001 | |||
Urban status - urban | −34.5 | −57.8, −11.2 | 0.004 | |||
Population density | 7.3 | 5.5, 9.1 | <0.001 | |||
Gender (% male) | 5.4 | −15.1, 25.9 | 0.604 | |||
Age (% 25–34 years) | 2.9 | −2.1, 7.9 | 0.260 | |||
Ethnicity (% non-White) |
−1.3 |
−3.2, 0.5 |
0.164 |
|||
Observations | 661 | 661 | ||||
R2/R2 adjusted | 0.032/0.026 | 0.777/0.774 |
Population density was scaled to reflect a unit change of 100 people per km2. Brackets following variable names provide further information on the measure such as units.