Table 3.
Comparison of postoperative recovery, rescue analgesia, and adverse reactions between the two groups.
| Variables | Total (n = 154) | ESPB (n = 77) | TAPB (n = 77) | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operation time, min | 155.00 (120.00, 215.00) | 150.00 (120.00, 200.00) | 155.00 (125.00, 225.00) | 0.395 |
| Intraoperative bleeding, ml | 200.00 (100.00, 300.00) | 200.00 (100.00, 200.00) | 150.00 (100.00, 300.00) | 0.846 |
| First time to press PCIA pump, min | 405.00 (300.00, 527.00) | 413.00 (248.00, 604.00) | 384.00 (305.00, 447.00) | 0.347 |
| First time out of the bed, h | 23.00 (22.00, 26.00) | 23.00 (22.00, 27.00) | 23.00 (22.00, 26.00) | 0.565 |
| First time to exhaust, h | 46.30 ± 13.25 | 47.56 ± 13.77 | 45.05 ± 12.68 | 0.243 |
| Time to remove urinary catheter, h | 20.99 ± 0.08 | 21.00 ± 0.00 | 20.99 ± 0.11 | 0.320 |
| Hospital stay, day | 7.00 (6.00, 8.00) | 7.00 (6.00, 7.00) | 7.00 (6.00, 8.00) | 0.652 |
| Analgesia satisfaction | <0.001 | |||
| 3 | 107 (69.48) | 37 (48.05) | 70 (90.91) | |
| 4 | 47 (30.52) | 40 (51.95) | 7 (9.09) | |
| Rescue analgesia requirements | 0.023 | |||
| No | 125 (81.17) | 68 (88.31) | 57 (74.03) | |
| Yes | 29 (18.83) | 9 (11.69) | 20 (25.97) | |
| Rescue analgesic consumption at 24 h, mg | 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) | 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) | 0.00 (0.00, 50.00) | 0.032 |
| Total adverse reaction | <0.001 | |||
| No | 112 (72.73) | 67 (87.01) | 45 (58.44) | |
| Yes | 42 (27.27) | 10 (12.99) | 32 (41.56) | |
| Nausea and vomiting | <0.001 | |||
| No | 114 (74.03) | 68 (88.31) | 46 (59.74) | |
| Yes | 40 (25.97) | 9 (11.69) | 31 (40.26) | |
| Other adverse reaction | 1.000 | |||
| No | 151 (98.05) | 76 (98.70) | 75 (97.40) | |
| Yes | 3 (1.95) | 1 (1.30) | 2 (2.60) |
ESPB, erector spinae plane block; TAPB, transversus abdominis plane block; PCIA, patient-controlled intravenous analgesia.
total adverse reaction includes nausea, vomiting, cough, and fever. Other adverse reaction means cough and fever.
The measurement data in normal distribution were described as mean ± SD, and compared using independent sample t-test. The measurement data in non-normal distribution were described as M (Q1, Q3), and compared using rank-sum test. The counting data were described as n (%), and compared using χ2 test. The ranking data was shown as n (%), and compared using rank-sum test.