Table 4. Main characteristics of included article evaluated the association between folate and respiratory-related viral infection.
Authors | Study design | Sample size | Biomarker | Dose | Result* | Mean or range of age (yr) | Target |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acosta-Elias and Espinosa-Tanguma (2020) [58] | Cross-sectional | 94, pregnant women | The likelihood of requiring hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection | - | + | - | COVID-19 |
137, non-pregnant in 2009 A-H1N1 pandemic | A-H1N1 pandemic | ||||||
908 of those patients were non-pregnant women in reproductive age | |||||||
55, pregnant women in COVID-19 pandemic | |||||||
Hamer et al. (2009) [59] | Cross-sectional | 352 | Vitamins and minerals concentration | - | + | Men, 75.8 | Respiratory infections |
Women, 73.7 | |||||||
Itelman et al. (2020) [60] | Cohort | 162 | Blood folate concentration | - | + | 52 | COVID-19 |
COVID-19, coronavirus disease 2019; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
*+: significant effect on the prevention of respiratory-related viral infection; −: no significant effect on the prevention of respiratory-related viral infection.