Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;32(2):183–192. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0712

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis, endpoints hrHPV positivity, CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ (with imputation), women aged 35+ years who have previously been screened (N = 720,976).

Unadjusted model Adjusted models
Model 1 Model 2a Model 3b Model 4c
OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI) OR (95% CI)
hrHPV positivity
 Clinician-collected 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Self-sampling 0.73 (0.70–0.76) 0.73 (0.70–0.77) 0.73 (0.70–0.76) 0.66 (0.63–0.69)
CIN 2+
 Clinician-collected 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Self-sampling 0.78 (0.69–0.88) 0.78 (0.69–0.88) 0.78 (0.69–0.88) 0.73 (0.65–0.83)
CIN 3+
 Clinician-collected 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref) 1.00 (ref)
 Self-sampling 0.87 (0.75–1.02) 0.88 (0.75–1.03) 0.88 (0.75–1.03) 0.83 (0.71–0.97)

Note: All cases with missing values for household income and/or screening region (0.8% of total cohort) are excluded from the analyses presented in this table. Ten rounds of imputation were used to replace missing CIN2+/CIN3+ endpoints for women with a hrHPV-positive self-sampling and no cytology result. Pooled ORs are presented for these endpoints. Pooled ORs with 95% CI not including 1.00 are shown in bold.

aAdjusted for age.

bAdjusted for age and screening region.

cAdjusted for age, screening region, and sociodemographic characteristics.