Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 20;19:100549. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100549

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Evaluation of the polarization ability of macrophages induced by different Exos in vitro and vivo. (a) Immunofluorescence staining of CD206 in macrophages treated with different Exos for 24 ​h. Scale bar ​= ​20 ​μm. (b) RT-qPCR detection of M2 (CD163、Arg-1、CD206) marker gene expression in macrophages cultured with different Exos for 24 ​h (n ​= ​3). (∗∗P ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗P ​< ​0.005). (c) Quantitative analysis of the Im-munofluorescence staining (∗P ​< ​0.05, ∗∗P ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗P ​< ​0.005, ∗∗∗∗P ​< ​0.001). N ​= ​3. (d) Immunofluorescence staining of CD68+/CD86+/CD206+ macrophages in synovium at 14 days after surgery. Scale bar ​= ​20 ​μm. (e) Gene expression of CD206 and CD86 in synovium macrophages at 14 days (∗P ​< ​0.05, ∗∗P ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗P ​< ​0.005) (n ​= ​3). (f) Quantitative analysis of Immunofluorescence staining of CD86+/CD206+ macrophages in synovium (∗P ​< ​0.05, ∗∗P ​< ​0.01, ∗∗∗P ​< ​0.005, ∗∗∗∗P ​< ​0.001). N ​= ​3.