Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 6;9(1):00451-2022. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00451-2022

TABLE 2.

Comparison between asthmatic and nonasthmatic subject demographic, functional and inflammatory characteristics in the training cohort (n=166)

Asthmatic subjects (n=105) Nonasthmatic subjects (n=61)
Age (years) 52±16 48±17
Male 40 (42) 47 (29)
BMI (kg·m−2) 27±4.3 27±5.5
Smoking status
 Nonsmoker 48 (51) 59 (36)
 Ex-smoker 28 (29) 21 (13)
 Current smoker 24 (25) 20 (12)
Atopy 48 (50) 44 (28)
FEV1 (% pred) 86±18 98±16****
 FEV1 <80% pred 27 (28) 11 (7)
FEV1/FVC (%) 76±9 82±6.7****
 FEV1/FVC <75% 43 (46) 16 (10)
FENO (ppb) 22 (15–37) 19 (13–27.5)*
FENO >25 ppb 40 (42) 36 (22)
Sputum eosinophils (%)# 1 (0–5) 0.8 (0.05–2.65)
Blood eosinophils (%) 2.7 (1.45–4.5) 2.1 (1.3–3.2)
Blood eosinophils (μL−1) 190 (110–320) 140 (98–260)
 Blood eosinophils >300 μL−1 26 (27) 18 (11)
Total serum IgE (kU·L−1) 80 (27.5–272) 42 (17–148)
Wheezing intensity score 1.48±1.1 0.84±1.1***
Dyspnoea intensity score 2.09±1.1 1.87±1.1
Cough intensity score 1.63±1 1.52±1.1
Airway secretion intensity score 1.28±1 1.08±1.1
Chest tightness intensity score 1.57±1.2 1.52±1

Data are presented as % (n), mean±sd or median (interquartile range). BMI: body mass index; FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; FENO: exhaled nitric oxide fraction. #: n=57 asthmatic subjects and n=38 nonasthmatic subjects. *: p<0.05; ***: p<0.001; ****: p<0.0001.