Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 6;9(1):00451-2022. doi: 10.1183/23120541.00451-2022

TABLE 5.

Multivariate logistic regression on the training cohort (n=166)

OR (95% CI)
Model 1 Wheezing 1.72 (1.26–2.40)**
Model 2 Wheezing 1.59 (1.16–2.22)**
FEV1 (%) 0.96 (0.93–0.98)**
Model 3 Wheezing 1.61 (1.17–2.27)**
FEV1/FVC (%) 0.91 (0.86–0.96)**
Model 4 Wheezing 1.62 (1.19–2.25)**
F ENO 1.02 (0.99–1.04)
Model 5 Wheezing 1.57 (1.14–2.19)**
FEV1 (% pred) 0.97 (0.94–0.99)*
FEV1/FVC (%) 0.94 (0.88–0.99)*
Model 6 Wheezing 1.53 (1.11–2.18)*
FEV1 (% pred) 0.95 (0.93–0.98)***
F ENO 1.02 (1.00–1.05)*
Model 7 Wheezing 1.50 (1.08–2.11)*
FEV1/FVC (%) 0.91 (0.86–0.96)***
F ENO 1.01 (0.99–1.03)
Model 8 Wheezing 1.48 (1.07–2.11)*
FEV1 (% pred) 0.96 (0.94–0.99)*
FEV1/FVC (%) 0.94 (0.88–1.01)
F ENO 1.02 (0.99–1.04)

FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC: forced vital capacity; FENO: exhaled nitric oxide fraction. *: p<0.05; **: p<0.01; ***: p<0.001.