Table 3.
Associations of social tie's efforts to motivate unhealthy behaviors with students’ change in current and expected health behavior (regression analysis).
Current food consumption (T2) | Current physical activity (T2) | Current # of drinks consumed monthly (T2) | Current binge drinking (T2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | |
HB at T1 | .28 | .11 | .31a | –.24 | .14 | –.21 | .68 | .20 | .38b | .20 | .13 | .21 |
Parents’ Influence UB | –.13 | .54 | –.03 | 3.19 | 1.65 | .25 | 14.69 | 6.29 | .29a | .26 | .29 | .13 |
Partner's Influence UB | –.22 | .46 | –.06 | .01 | 1.30 | .01 | –3.06 | 3.89 | –.11 | .22 | .18 | .19 |
Peers’ Influence UB | –.09 | .46 | –.03 | .37 | 1.56 | .03 | –6.24 | 3.37 | –.24 | –.20 | .16 | –.19 |
R2 | .11 | .10 | .33b | .13 |
Expected food consumption (T2) | Expected physical activity (T2) | Expected # of drinks consumed monthly (T2) | Expected binge drinking (T2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | B | SE B | β | |
Expected HB at T1 | .19 | .12 | .19 | –.25 | .14 | –.21 | .15 | .28 | .07 | .14 | .12 | .15 |
Parents’ Influence UB | .45 | .57 | .10 | 3.29 | 1.52 | .28a | 14.89 | 9.21 | .24 | .39 | .26 | .22 |
Partner's Influence UB | –.72 | .49 | –.19 | –.60 | 1.22 | –.07 | –1.78 | 5.75 | –.05 | .17 | .16 | .16 |
Peers’ Influence UB | –.47 | .49 | –.13 | 1.39 | 1.45 | .13 | –4.65 | 5.01 | –.14 | –.12 | .14 | –.13 |
R2 | .11 | .13 | .07 | .09 |
Note. N = 163. HB = health behavior. T1/T2 = first/second point of measurement. B = unstandardized regression coefficient. SE = standard error. β = standardized regression coefficient. UB = unhealthy behavior. HB at T1 corresponds to the behavior represented in each column. Social tie's influence for unhealthy behavior refers to the corresponding participant behavior. ap < .05, bp < .01.