Table 2.
Reuse of PPE during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in New Zealand, by profession
| Medical (n=269) | Nursing (n=468) | Dental (n=86) | Allied health (n=486) | Other health (n=102) | Total (n=1411) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reuse of PPE | ||||||
| Personally reused PPE | 164 (61%) | 182 (39%) | 41 (48%) | 198 (41%) | 43 (42%) | 628 (45%) |
| Reusing PPE items multiple times in 1 day* | 92/164 (56%) | 116/182 (64%) | 22/41 (54%) | 136/198 (69%) | 30/43 (70%) | 396/628 (63%) |
| Reusing PPE items multiple times over more than 1 day* | 36/164 (22%) | 26/182 (14%) | 9/41 (22%) | 24/198 (12%) | 6/43 (14%) | 101/628 (16%) |
| Other*† | 4/164 (2%) | 9/182 (5%) | 2/41 (5%) | 3/198 (2%) | 3/43 (7%) | 21/628 (3%) |
| Organisation collected PPE for reuse | ||||||
| Yes | 117 (43%) | 124 (26%) | 14 (16%) | 57 (12%) | 22 (22%) | 334 (24%) |
| No | 90 (33%) | 235 (50%) | 64 (74%) | 289 (59%) | 51 (50%) | 729 (52%) |
| Do not know | 62 (23%) | 109 (23%) | 8 (9%) | 140 (29%) | 29 (28%) | 348 (25%) |
| Items of PPE collected by organisation*‡ | ||||||
| Filtering facepiece respirators | 49/117 (42%) | 32/124 (26%) | 4/14 (29%) | 20/57 (35%) | 12/22 (55%) | 117/334 (35%) |
| Surgical masks | 18/117 (15%) | 10/124 (8%) | 2/14 (14%) | 9/57 (16%) | 1/22 (5%) | 40/334 (12%) |
| Gowns | 29/117 (25%) | 28/124 (23%) | 8/14 (57%) | 13/57 (23%) | 3/22 (14%) | 81/334 (24%) |
| Face shields | 80/117 (68%) | 85/124 (69%) | 10/14 (71%) | 33/57 (58%) | 13/22 (59%) | 221/334 (66%) |
| Eyewear | 83/117 (71%) | 99/124 (80%) | 10/14 (71%) | 44/57 (77%) | 10/22 (45%) | 246/334 (74%) |
| Other§ | 2/117 (2%) | .. | .. | 4/57 (7%) | .. | 6/334 (2%) |
| Well communicated rationale for collection‡ | ||||||
| Yes | 85/117 (73%) | 88/124 (71%) | 14 (100%) | 43/57 (75%) | 16/22 (73%) | 246/334 (74%) |
| No | 25/117 (21%) | 32/124 (26%) | .. | 10/57 (18%) | 5/22 (23%) | 72/334 (22%) |
| Do not know | 7/117 (6%) | 4/124 (3%) | .. | 4/57 (7%) | 1/22 (5%) | 16/334 (5%) |
Data are n (%) or n/N (%). PPE=personal protective equipment.
Multiple responses possible, so totals add up to 100% or more.
“Other” responses given by participants included: reuse after a stand-down period, reuse if perception of low risk, reuse on a single patient, and reuse of specific items of PPE.
Percentages reported are of participants whose organisations collected PPE for reuse, by profession.
“Other” responses given by participants included gloves, other types of masks, and other garments.