Skip to main content
. 2022 May 4;42(1):39–52. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.189

Table 2.

Randomized controlled trials on treatments of uremic pruritus

Study Design Country Population No. of patients Treatment duration (wk) Treatment Pruritus assessment Results
Topical treatment
 Capsaicin
  Tarng et al., 1996 [42] Crossover Taiwan HD 19 4 Capsaicin 0.025% cream vs. placebo 4-Point scale 82.4% of participants experienced relief of pruritus after receiving capsaicin cream; capsaicin cream was more effective in improving itching score than placebo (p < 0.001).
  Cho et al., 1997 [43] Crossover Taiwan HD 22 4 Capsaicin 0.025% cream vs. placebo 4-Point scale 86.4% of participants experienced relief of pruritus after receiving capsaicin cream; 22.7% experienced relief of pruritus after placebo treatment (p < 0.001).
 Calcineurin inhibitors
  Duque et al., 2005 [44] Parallel United States HD 22 4 0.1% Tacrolimus ointment vs. placebo VAS Percentage of reduction in VAS was not different between tacrolimus (77%) and placebo groups (79%).
  Ghorbani et al., 2011 [45] Parallel Iran HD 60 8 Topical pimecrolimus 1% vs. placebo VAS Change in VAS was not different between pimecrolimus (–6) and placebo groups (–7).
 Pramoxine
  Young et al., 2009 [46] Parallel United States HD 28 4 1% Pramoxine lotion vs. placebo VAS Percentage of reduction in VAS was higher in the pramoxine group (61%) than in the placebo group (12%) (p = 0.0072).
 Gamma-linolenic acid
  Chen et al., 2006 [47] Crossover Taiwan HD, PD 17 2 2.2% Gamma-linolenic acid cream vs. placebo VAS, QPS More reduction of VAS in the gamma-linolenic acid group (–4.5) than the placebo group (–0.5) (p < 0.01).
Treatment of underlying disease
 Dialysis modality
  Chen et al., 2009 [48] Parallel China HD 116 12 High-flux HD vs. low-flux HD VAS More reduction of VAS in the high-flux group (–3.99) than the low-flux group (–0.71).
  Jiang et al., 2016 [49] Parallel China HD 51 12 High-flux HD vs. hemodiafiltration VAS, QPS More reduction of VAS in the high-flux HD group (–7.2) than the hemodiafiltration group (–5.6) (p < 0.05).
  Lim et al., 2020 [50] Parallel South Korea HD 50 12 MCO dialyzer vs. high-flux dialyzer VAS, QPS MCO group had lower scores for morning pruritus distribution and frequency of scratching during sleep at week 12. Between-group differences for VAS were not significant.
 Cinacalcet
  El-Shafey et al., 2011 [51] Parallel Kuwait, Saudi Arabia HD 82 36 Cinacalcet vs. vitamin D + phosphate binder QPS Pruritus intensity decreased from 3.38 at baseline to 1.74 at week 36 in the cinacalcet group.
Phototherapy
  Gilchrest et al., 1977 [52] Parallel United States HD 24 4 Broadband UVB vs. UVA 4-Point scale 90% of participants in the UVB group and 25% in UVA group showed improvement of pruritus (p < 0.01).
  Ko et al., 2011 [53] Parallel Taiwan CKD, HD, PD 21 6 Narrowband UVB vs. UVA VAS Change in VAS was not different between the UVB (–3.53) and UVA groups (–3.38) (p = 0.92).
Systemic treatment
 Gabapentinoids
  Gunal et al., 2004 [54] Crossover Turkey HD 25 4 Gabapentin vs. placebo VAS More reduction of VAS in the gabapentin group (–6.7) than the placebo group (–0.8) (p < 0.001).
  Naini et al., 2007 [55] Parallel Iran HD 34 4 Gabapentin vs. placebo VAS More reduction of VAS in the gabapentin group (–6.7) than the placebo group (–1.5) (p < 0.001).
  Solak et al., 2012 [56] Crossover Turkey HD 29 6 Gabapentin vs. pregabalin VAS Change in VAS was not different between the gabapentin (–4.41) and the pregabalin groups (–4.43) (p = 0.844).
  Yue et al., 2015 [57] Parallel China HD 188 12 Pregabalin vs. ondansetron vs. placebo VAS, QPS More reduction of VAS in the pregabalin group (–6.6) than the ondansetron (–2.5) or placebo (–2.0) groups (p < 0.05).
  Nofal et al., 2016 [58] Parallel Egypt HD 54 3 Gabapentin vs. placebo VAS, QPS More reduction of VAS in the gabapentin group (–5.82) than the placebo group (–0.1) (p < 0.001).
  Foroutan et al., 2017 [59] Parallel Iran HD 90 4 Pregabalin vs. doxepin VAS More reduction of VAS in the pregabalin group (–5.4) than the doxepin group (–2.9) (p < 0.001).
  Gobo-Oliveira et al., 2018 [60] Parallel Brazil HD 60 3 Gabapentin vs. dexchlorpheniramine VAS, QPS Change in VAS was not different between the gabapentin (–4) and the dexchlorpheniramine groups (–4) (p > 0.7).
  Rossi et al., 2019 [61] Parallel Italy HD 25 2 Gabapentin 300 mg vs. gabapentin 100 mg vs. placebo VAS, QPS Compared with the placebo group (–11.1%), there was a higher percentage of VAS reduction in both the gabapentin 300 mg group (–81.6%, p = 0.0121) and gabapentin 100 mg group (–48.3%, p = 0.0379).
  Haber et al., 2020 [62] Crossover Lebanon HD 16 4 Gabapentin vs. doxepin VAS, QPS More reduction of VAS in the gabapentin group (–6.14) than the doxepin group (–3.78) (p < 0.001).
 Opioid antagonists and agonists
  Peer et al., 1996 [63] Crossover Israel HD 15 1 Naltrexone vs. placebo VAS More reduction of VAS in the naltrexone group (–8.3) than the placebo group (–1.1).
  Pauli-Magnus et al., 2000 [64] Crossover Germany HD, PD 23 4 Naltrexone vs. placebo VAS, QPS Percentage of reduction in VAS was not different between the naltrexone (29.2%) and placebo groups (16.9%) (p = 0.095).
  Wikström et al., 2005 [65] Parallel Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland HD 79 4 Nalfurafine vs. placebo VAS Change in VAS was not different between the nalfurafine (–2.5) and placebo groups (–1.27) (p = 0.0649).
  Wikström et al., 2005 [65] Crossover Poland HD 34 2 Nalfurafine vs. placebo VAS Change in VAS was not different between the nalfurafine (–2.21) and placebo groups (–1.35) (p = 0.0863).
  Kumagai et al., 2010 [66] Parallel Japan HD 339 2 Nalfurafine 5 μg vs. nalfurafine 2.5 μg vs. placebo VAS Compared with placebo group (–1.3), there was a greater reduction of VAS in the nalfurafine 5 μg group (–2.2, p = 0.0002) and nalfurafine 2.5 μg group (–2.3, p = 0.0001).
  Mathur et al., 2017 [67] Parallel United States HD 373 8 Nalbuphine 120 mg vs. nalbuphine 60 mg vs. placebo 11-Point NRS, QPS A greater reduction of NRS occurred in the nalbuphine 120 mg group (–3.5) than the placebo group (–2.8) (p = 0.017).
  Fishbane et al., 2020 [40] Parallel United States HD 378 12 Difelikefalin vs. placebo 11-Point NRS, QPS 49.1% of the difelikefalin group and 27.9% of the placebo group exhibited improvement in pruritus intensity (p < 0.001).
  Fishbane et al., 2020 [68] Parallel United States HD 175 8 Difelikefalin (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 μg/kg) vs. placebo 11-Point NRS, QPS A greater reduction of NRS in all difelikefalin groups combined (–3.2) compared with the placebo group (–1.9) (p = 0.002).
 Mast cell stabilizers & leukotriene receptor antagonists
  Vessal et al., 2010 [69] Parallel Iran HD 62 8 Cromolyn sodium vs. placebo VAS A greater reduction of VAS in the cromolyn sodium group (–7.78) than the placebo group (–2.90) (p < 0.001).
  Mahmudpour et al., 2017 [70] Parallel Iran HD 80 4 Montelukast vs. placebo VAS, QPS A greater reduction of VAS in the montelukast group (–2.73) than the placebo group (–5.47) (p < 0.001).
 Oral activated charcoal
  Pederson et al., 1980 [71] Crossover United States HD 11 8 Activated charcoal vs. placebo QPS A greater reduction of pruritus intensity in the activated charcoal group than the placebo group (p = 0.01 in the first crossover period; p = 0.05 in the second crossover period).
 Cholestyramine
  Silverberg et al., 1977 [72] Parallel Israel HD 10 4 Cholestyramine vs. placebo 4-Point scale Pruritus improved considerably in 80% of the cromolyn sodium group and 20% of the placebo group.
 Biologics
  Kinugasa et al., 2021 [73] Parallel Japan HD 56 4 Nemolizumab (0.125, 0.5, or 2.0 mg/kg) vs. placebo VAS, QPS Reduction in VAS was not different between each nemolizumab group and the placebo group.
 Thalidomide
  Silva et al., 1994 [74] Crossover Brazil HD 29 1 Thalidomide vs. placebo 4-Point scale Pruritus improved in 55.6% of the thalidomide group and 13.3% of the placebo group (p < 0.05).
 Sertraline
  Pakfetrat et al., 2018 [75] Parallel Iran HD 50 8 Sertraline vs. placebo VAS, QPS Reduction in VAS showed a borderline difference between the sertraline group (–5.5) and the placebo group (–3.7) (p = 0.07).

CKD, chronic kidney disease; HD, hemodialysis; MCO, medium cut-off; NRS, numerical rating scale; PD, peritoneal dialysis; QPS, questionnaire pruritus score; UVA, ultraviolet A; UVB, ultraviolet B; VAS, visual analog scale.