Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 7;380:e071058. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-071058

Table 6.

Example of an individual participant data meta-analysis reporting result of the risk-of-bias assessment for the included studies. Information adapted from information licensed under the Non-Commercial Government Licence version 2.0115

Study/dataset Domain: predictors
Predictors defined in a similar way for participants Predictors defined in a similar way to model development study Predictors assessed without knowledge of outcome data All predictors available at the time model is to be used Risk Rationale
Allen Yes NA Yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
ALSPAC Yes NA Yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
Chappell Probably no NA Probably yes Yes High Historical data and definition of predictor may differ over time
EMPOWAR Yes NA Yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
Poston 2006 Yes NA Yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
Poston 2005 Yes NA Yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
UK SCOPE Yes Yes Yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
St Georges Probably yes NA Probably yes Yes Low Responses all yes to signalling questions
Velauthar No information NA No information Yes Unclear No information to make assessment

Risk-of-bias assessment for predictors available in an individual participant data meta-analysis to develop and validate predictions models for pre-eclampsia. NA=not applicable; SCOPE=Screening for Pregnancy Endpoints; ALSPAC=Avon Longitudinal Study of Children and Parents; EMPOWAR=Efficacy of Metformin in Pregnant Obese Women (a randomised controlled trial).