Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 16;43(2):309–318. doi: 10.1177/0271678X221133859

Table 3.

Output of the linear mixed-effects models with age of patients at each visit as the time variable, cognition domain-specific z-scores as dependent variables and low-grade carotid stenosis as independent variable.

Executive functioning
Memory
Estimate (95% CI) p-value Estimate (95% CI p-value
Intercept
 Model 1 –0.84 (–1.37 to –0.32) 0.002 –0.29 (–0.84 to 0.27) 0.311
 Model 2 –0.78 (–1.31 to –0.25) 0.004 –0.30 (–0.86 to 0.26) 0.293
Time
 Model 1 –0.06 (–0.08 to –0.05) <0.001 –0.06 (–0.04 to –0.08) <0.001
 Model 2 –0.06 (–0.07 to –0.04) <0.001 –0.06 (–0.04 to –0.07) <0.001
LGCSa
 Model 1 –0.06 (–0.20 to 0.09) 0.403 0.05 (–0.10 to 0.20) 0.496
 Model 2 –0.04 (–0.18 to 0.10) 0.577 0.04 (–0.11 to 0.19) 0.586
LGCS x Time
 Model 1 –0.020 (–0.031 to –0.01) <0.001 –0.012 (–0.02 to –0.001) 0.032
 Model 2 –0.017 (–0.028 to –0.006) 0.003 –0.010 (–0.02 to 0.001) 0.082

Model 1: adjusted for sex, education level, practice effect, large infarcts on MRI, lacunes on MRI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, smoking pack years and alcohol use at baseline.

Model 2: model 1 with time-varying covariates for large infarcts and lacunes on MRI.

aNo LGCS as the reference category.

CI: confidence interval; LGCS: low-grade carotid stenosis.