Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 23;7:100153. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100153

Table 4.

Ranking of treatment destination municipalities (cancer care hubs) based on the number of connections with other municipalities.

Treatment type Rank Destination municipality Region Number of municipality connections as a treatment destination (indegree) % of non-residents relative to the total patients assisted
SURGERY 2009–2010
1 Barretos SE 636 95·5%
2 Belo Horizonte SE 369 62·9%
3 Salvador NE 341 57·9%
2017–2018
1 Barretos SE 730 91·8%
2 Salvador NE 395 59·3%
3 São Paulo SE 328 35·4%
RADIOTHERAPY 2009–2010
1 Barretos SE 749 95·2%
2 Teresina NE 390 69·8%
3 Belo Horizonte SE 376 65·6%
2017–2018
1 Barretos SE 948 94·3%
2 Salvador NE 371 57·1%
3 Belo Horizonte SE 345 59·7%
CHEMOTHERAPY 2009–2010
1 Barretos SE 811 95·0%
2 Belo Horizonte SE 463 53·5%
3 Teresina NE 400 64·1%
2017–2018
1 Barretos SE 1192 92·4%
2 São Paulo SE 508 34·0%
3 Salvador NE 402 54·2%

SE: southeast; NE: northeast.