TABLE 2.
Network meta-analysis of adequate bowel preparation.
| NR + A | PEG + A + P | H + pre-PEG | PEG + P | NR + IR | H PEG | NR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.01 (.10, 11.29) | ||||||
| 1.97 (.12, 32.99) | 1.94 (.07, 48.21) | |||||
| 2.16 (.28, 17.20) | 2.09 (.17, 28.98) | 1.10 (.05, 21.70) | ||||
| 5.21 (1.18, 24.55) | 5.14 (.56, 48.51) | 2.66 (.21, 48.70) | 2.43 (.38, 16.92) | |||
| 8.70 (1.75, 52.56) | 8.66 (.87, 96.40) | 4.42 (.49, 45.30) | 4.09 (.55, 33.15) | 1.67 (.49, 6.02) | ||
| 7.37 (2.33, 26.39) | 7.43 (.96, 55.09) | 3.80 (.32, 48.70) | 3.47 (.68, 19.02) | 1.43 (.59, 3.41) | .85 (.24, 2.71) |
NR, normal regimen such as using low-volume PEG or NaP; NR + IR, NR plus irritating laxative regimens; NR + A, NR plus advanced intestinal regulation; PEG + P, PEG plus prokinetic agents; PEG + A + P, PEG plus advanced intestinal regulation and prokinetic agents; H PEG, high-volume PEG; H + pre-PEG, H PEG plus once pre-using of PEG.
Effect estimates presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).
pvalue < .05 are in bold.