Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 25;10:1084946. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1084946

Table 3.

Distribution characteristics of ITP behavior in two clusters.

Variables Itemζ “Low” “High”
Excellent τ Moderate ξ Poor ϕ Excellent Moderate Poor
Total score 19 0 (0.00) 197 (99.49) 1 (0.50) 30 (25.42) 88 (74.58) 0 (0.00)
Dietary therapy 3 162 (81.82) 36 (18.18) 0 (0.00) 109 (92.37) 9 (7.63) 0 (0.00)
Exercise 2 84 (42.42) 104 (52.53) 10 (5.05) 88 (74.58) 27 (22.88) 3 (2.54)
Foot care 3 5 (2.53) 183 (92.42) 10 (5.05) 71 (60.17) 47 (39.83) 0 (0.00)
Prescribed medication 1 191 (96.46) 6 (3.03) 1 (0.50) 118 (100.00) 0 (0.00) 0 (0.00)
Glucose and blood pressure monitoring 3 24 (12.12) 160 (80.81) 14 (7.07) 34 (28.81) 80 (67.80) 4 (3.39)
Complication examination 3 2 (1.01) 65 (32.83) 131 (66.16) 22 (18.64) 79 (66.95) 17 (14.41)
Access to public health services 4 0 (0.00) 121 (61.11) 77 (38.89) 30 (25.42) 88(74.58) 0 (0.00)

Itemζ: the number of entries for behavior subscale and each dimension.

Excellentτ: good performance of integrated treatment and prevention (ITP) behavior (score index ≥ 80%).

Moderateξ: the ITP behavior of diabetics was moderately good (40%≥ score index < 80%).

Poorϕ: the performance of ITP behavior in diabetic patients was poor (score index < 40%).