Skip to main content
. 2022 Jul 5;39(2):213–244. doi: 10.1007/s12264-022-00897-8

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of fibroblasts in the glial scar. A Spatial maps showing the distribution of the three fibroblast clusters in the glial scar at different time points after injury. B UMAP spots showing the three clusters of fibroblasts in the glial scar. C UMAP spots embedding overlay showing the distribution of spots at different time points after injury. D Bar plot showing the fraction of all spots comprising each subpopulation at different time points after injury. E Jitterplot showing the top 5 differentially-expressed genes. F Spatial maps showing the GSVA scores of the ECM-receptor interaction pathway enrichment in cluster 2 cells and the glycosaminoglycan degradation pathway enrichment in cluster 1 cells at different time points after injury. G, H Trajectory of fibroblasts in the glial scar. I Heat map showing the upregulated or downregulated genes in different cell fates. J Violin plots showing the expression of Slc1a3 in the three clusters. K Dot plots showing the marker genes that best identify type A pericytes. L Pie chart showing the percentages of Slc1a3+ cells in the three fibroblast clusters (n = 32). M Violin plots and spatial maps showing the expression of Postn, a myofibroblast differentiation marker, at different time points after injury. N Violin plots and spatial maps showing the expression of Kng2 at different time points after injury. O Violin plots and spatial maps showing the expression of Saa3, an inflammatory ligand, at different time points after injury.