Table 8.

Comparison of proposed method with existing works.

References	Dataset	Accuracy (%)
Asrat et al. (8)	–	82.7
Mekonen et al. (10)	–	72.7
Jaeger et al. (25)	SZ dataset	90.0
Lopes and Vailiati (26)	SZ and MC datasets	92.6
This study	Our dataset	94.0