Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 30;22(4):1245–1252. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16909

TABLE 3.

Comparison of antibody levels between SOTRs and controls utilizing only matched paired samples

Anti-N-IgG
Months SOTRs
Controls
n diff G-mean ratio Lower 95% CL for ratio Upper 95% CL for ratio p
n G-mean CV (%) n G-mean CV (%)
1 22 1.77 748.5 23 4.05 144.2 12 0.16 0.04 0.54 .007
3 42 0.98 568.2 55 3.80 104.6 40 0.27 0.15 0.51 .0001
6 41 0.54 433.4 29 1.55 187.9 23 0.30 0.11 0.80 .019
9 20 0.39 359.6 41 1.06 184.3 18 0.31 0.11 0.82 .021
Anti-S-IgG
Months SOTRs
Controls
n diff G-mean ratio Lower 95% CL for ratio Upper 95% CL for ratio p
n G-mean CV (%) n G-mean CV (%)
1 22 164.7 1151.6 21 158.1 331.6 11 0.51 0.04 6.65 .570
3 46 71.7 5705.8 55 169.2 218.0 42 0.42 0.17 1.02 .055
6 45 78.9 1642.5 27 67.8 189.3 21 0.61 0.19 1.99 .393
9 28 46.9 5543.3 41 74.0 269.4 24 0.71 0.16 3.25 .650

Note: Comparison between groups at each time point by applying a t-test to the differences of log-transformed data within each matched pair. The analysis only uses serological data points that have a corresponding data point available in the matched control.

Values in bold are considered statistically significant with a p value <.05.