Table 1.
Evaluation Resultsa
mode | X data set | Y data set | RT MA.D. | accuracy (per variant) | weighted accuracy (per compd) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
semisupervised (including identities) | 30 MIN CHEAR | 20 MIN Red Cross | 0.056 | 259/270 | 0.91 |
unsupervised | 30 MIN CHEAR | 20 MIN Red Cross | 0.066 | 254/270 | 0.88 |
semisupervised (including identities) | 30 MIN Red Cross | 20 MIN CHEAR | 0.054 | 254/270 | 0.88 |
unsupervised | 30 MIN Red Cross | 20 MIN CHEAR | 0.07 | 250/270 | 0.86 |
Different subsets (CHEAR or Red Cross plasma) are used as data set X from the 30 min data set, with the opposite set from the 20 min data set serving as data set Y. Semisupervised model fits (inclusion of training set compounds) vs unsupervised (no prior information) in terms of mean absolute deviation (MAD) RT fit, feature matching accuracy per-feature and per-compound.