Table 2.
Competency dimension | Experience during GOT | Implications for post-GOT age training | Resources |
---|---|---|---|
Basic digital skills | Teachers had different levels of digital competencies | It is not possible to assume teachers’ digital competencies are homogeneous. Different learning paths are needed | Assessment tools for teachers’ digital competencies (Bilbao-Aiastui et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021)* |
The pedagogical application of digital technologies | Teachers learned to prioritize content and engage in more detailed planning | Teachers need systematic guidance on curriculum development and learning design to build upon their experiences |
Digital pedagogical planners (Laurillard et al., 2018) Curriculum analytics (Hilliger & Pérez-Sanagustín, 2022) |
Teachers employed several institutional (provided by their institutions) and non-institutional (not provided by their institutions) digital technologies for delivering content and promoting interaction | Teachers need technical training for integrating and embedding digital technologies in their institutional learning management system. More important, they need pedagogical frameworks to understand the role of digital technologies s and how students use them |
LMS handbooks (for example, John, 2021) A pedagogical framework for the use of digital technologies (Laurillard, 2013) Description of students’ use of digital technologies (González et al., 2022) |
|
Traditional rote memorization exams were not feasible. Teachers engage in practices that resemble authentic assessment | Teachers need training that helps them to systematize pandemic assessment practices. They need to conceptualize authentic assessments for post-GOT deployment |
A clear conceptual model for authentic assessment (Villarroel et al., 2018) An understanding of e-assessment practices (St‐Onge et al., 2022) |
|
The use of technology for continuous professional development | Teachers valued both technological and pedagogical professional development, but excessive training overloaded them | It is important to incorporate “pandemic lessons” in post-GOT professional development, broaden the range of activities (e.g., advancing towards participation in communities of practices or peer support), and consider issues related to work overload | A professional development framework for online and blended learning (Philipsen et al., 2019) |
The ability to further digital competencies for university students | Students made intensive use of social networks but were less prepared for using digital technologies in their learning processes and for learning digital tools for their professional disciplines | Teachers have much to do with furthering students’ digital competencies, particularly for learning and professional settings |
A pedagogical framework for the use of digital technologies (Laurillard, 2013) Description of students’ use of digital technologies (González et al., 2022) Discipline-specific digital tools and resources handbooks or other materials |
Transversal competencies | Teachers’ capacity to generate a safe learning environment, be accessible for students, and have the disposition to understand students’ situations, were essential during the pandemic | Teachers need professional development that helps deepen transversal competencies to maintain what they learned during the pandemic | Teaching competencies models by Villarroel and Bruna (2017) and Dervenis et al. (2022) |
*However, consider that existing ones have not been developed initially for higher education (there is a need for developing assessment tools specifically for higher education). Also, consider that post-GOT digital competencies may vary