Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;31(5 Suppl):2348–2365. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00291

Table 1.

Operationalized definitions of ratings with examples.

Rating Definition Example Rationale
Rating = 2: Successful transaction Response reflects comprehension of prompt and conveys to the communication partner meaningful information related to immediate prompt P: What are you doing this weekend?
PwA: We in NFL Saturday and Sunday
Conveys meaningful information despite syntactical error
Considerations:
 ◆ Graphemic/spelling errors acceptable as long as word is recognizable;
 ◆ Morphological and syntactical errors that do not affect meaning are acceptable;
 ◆ Successful self-corrections are acceptable
 ◆ Irrelevant or additional words or graphemes that do not change meaning are acceptable.
P: What about dinner? What kind of food should we have?
PwA: pizza like
Conveys meaningful information; additional word does not alter meaning

Rating = 1: Partial transaction

Response provides partial or incomplete information that conveys to the communication partner meaning within the context of the prompt

CP: What about dinner? What kind of food should we have?
PwA: Subway for dinner. Mexico!

Communication partner needs to clarify due to incongruent information (Do you want Subway or Mexican food?)
Considerations:
 ◆ Response may reflect impaired comprehension of prompt, e.g.,
  ○ answers a related question, such as a similar “wh” question
  ○ conveys temporally inaccurate information
  ○ conveys a request for clarification.
 ◆ Response to which communication partner may need to clarify, i.e., communication burden shared with communication partner,
  ○ response contains words or additional information that may alter the meaning or information that is incongruent.
P: When should we go?
PwA: Nick's
Response reflects impaired comprehension; answers “where” with name of restaurant
P: What are you doing this weekend?
PwA: I saw a good movie.
Response reflects impaired comprehension of prompt; temporally inaccurate

Rating = 0: No successful transaction

Response does not convey to the communication partner meaningful information within the context of the prompt

P: When should we go?
PwA: I go…

Not meaningful relative to the prompt; word from prompt is repeated without additional information
Considerations:
 ◆ Response contains words or graphemes that are unrecognizable in the context
 ◆ Response repeats prompt or part of prompt without adding additional meaningful information
P: What are you doing this weekend?
PwA: i w e
Single graphemes that do not convey meaningful information

Note. P = prompt; PwA = person with aphasia.