Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;31(5 Suppl):2348–2365. doi: 10.1044/2022_AJSLP-21-00291

Table 2.

Texting transactional success, severity, texting activity, and confidence.

Participant Texting transactional success
Aphasia severity based on WAB-R*
Number of texts*
Texting confidence*
Raw score Percent AQ LQ Writing Sent Received Total Technology survey
1 6/6 100.00 84.7 86.6 80 13 10 23 3
2 4/6 66.67 61.5 61.4 36 24 15 39 10
3 5/6 83.33 77.4 80 78 6 27 33 10
4 1/6 16.67 54.9 57.3 38.5 35 33 68 6
5 5/6 83.33 76.8 78.8 62.5 2 3 5 6.5
6 5/6 83.33 71.6 75.9 65.5 82 57 139 7
7 6/6 100.00 69.4 79.9 91 67 103 170 4
8 5/6 83.33 57.6 61.5 70 10 92 102 10
9 4/6 66.67 78.4 78.1 67 41 37 78 10
10 3/6 50.00 68.8 66.2 62.5 0 4 4 7
11 3/6 50.00 73 65.8 48 0 3 3 5
12 0/6 0.00 53.6 49.9 41.5 1 15 16 2
13 6/6 100.00 79.6 84.6 89 1 5 6 2
14 6/6 100.00 91.8 90.2 71.5 4 24 28 9
15 1/6 16.67 36.5 38.2 46 6 45 51 8
16 3/6 50.00 82.2 81.8 85.5 1 7 8 9
17 5/6 83.33 70.5 74.2 83 0 1 1 5
18 6/6 100.00 87.4 87.2 69.5 11 7 18 5
19 4/6 66.67 77.4 79.4 76 0 4 4 5
20 5/6 83.33 67.2 69.3 67 4 6 10 9

Note. WAB-R = Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (Kertesz, 2007); AQ = aphasia quotient; LQ = language quotient.

*

Data reported in Kinsey et al. (2021).