Table 2.
Participant | Texting transactional success |
Aphasia severity based on WAB-R*
|
Number of texts*
|
Texting confidence* |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Raw score | Percent | AQ | LQ | Writing | Sent | Received | Total | Technology survey | |
1 | 6/6 | 100.00 | 84.7 | 86.6 | 80 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 3 |
2 | 4/6 | 66.67 | 61.5 | 61.4 | 36 | 24 | 15 | 39 | 10 |
3 | 5/6 | 83.33 | 77.4 | 80 | 78 | 6 | 27 | 33 | 10 |
4 | 1/6 | 16.67 | 54.9 | 57.3 | 38.5 | 35 | 33 | 68 | 6 |
5 | 5/6 | 83.33 | 76.8 | 78.8 | 62.5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6.5 |
6 | 5/6 | 83.33 | 71.6 | 75.9 | 65.5 | 82 | 57 | 139 | 7 |
7 | 6/6 | 100.00 | 69.4 | 79.9 | 91 | 67 | 103 | 170 | 4 |
8 | 5/6 | 83.33 | 57.6 | 61.5 | 70 | 10 | 92 | 102 | 10 |
9 | 4/6 | 66.67 | 78.4 | 78.1 | 67 | 41 | 37 | 78 | 10 |
10 | 3/6 | 50.00 | 68.8 | 66.2 | 62.5 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
11 | 3/6 | 50.00 | 73 | 65.8 | 48 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
12 | 0/6 | 0.00 | 53.6 | 49.9 | 41.5 | 1 | 15 | 16 | 2 |
13 | 6/6 | 100.00 | 79.6 | 84.6 | 89 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 2 |
14 | 6/6 | 100.00 | 91.8 | 90.2 | 71.5 | 4 | 24 | 28 | 9 |
15 | 1/6 | 16.67 | 36.5 | 38.2 | 46 | 6 | 45 | 51 | 8 |
16 | 3/6 | 50.00 | 82.2 | 81.8 | 85.5 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
17 | 5/6 | 83.33 | 70.5 | 74.2 | 83 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
18 | 6/6 | 100.00 | 87.4 | 87.2 | 69.5 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 5 |
19 | 4/6 | 66.67 | 77.4 | 79.4 | 76 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
20 | 5/6 | 83.33 | 67.2 | 69.3 | 67 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
Note. WAB-R = Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (Kertesz, 2007); AQ = aphasia quotient; LQ = language quotient.
Data reported in Kinsey et al. (2021).