Skip to main content
. 2022 May 27;65(6):2343–2363. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-22-00051

Table 7.

Mean VFS summed scores and SEs at Time 1 and Time 2 for the Phase 4 respondents who completed the retest measure.

Summed Scores N Time 1 Time 2 Wilcoxon Z Spearman's Rho ICC
VFS-PMental 139 12.4 (0.65) 12.6 (0.60) −1.06 (.291) .90 (< 0.001) .90 [.87, .93]
VFS-PPhysical 139 11.5 (0.42) 10.7 (0.41) −2.56 (.011) .84 (< 0.001) .84 [.78, .88]
VFS-C 43 17.1 (1.47) 16.3 (1.60) −.985 (.325) .79 (< 0.001) .84 [.72, .91]
VFS-T 73 19.0 (0.76) 18.9 (0.68) −.458 (.647) .69 (< 0.001) .72 [.58, .81]

Note. Wilcoxon Z and the resultant p values in parentheses are shown in the fifth column. Spearman's correlation (r s) and ICC values for comparisons of scores at T1 and T2 are shown in the sixth and final columns, respectively. ICC 95% confidence intervals are shown in brackets. Bolded values are significant. VFS = Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale; SEs = standard errors; N = number of participants in the sample; ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient; VFS-P = VFS parent proxy–report scale; VFS-C = VFS child self-report scale; VFS-T = VFS teacher proxy–report scale.