| Author | Title | Reasons |
|---|---|---|
| Bak et al. 58 | Portable device, based on a microcontroller, for measurement of TEWL factor | Describes methods of experiments to test devices that measure TEWL. Is not a comparison of devices. |
| Baker and Kligman 59 | Measurements of TEWL by electrical hygrometry: instrumentation and responses to physical and chemical insults | Measurements taken under different conditions but no measurements for purposes of measuring reliability or comparison with another device. |
| Cohen et al. 60 | Comparison of closed and open chamber evaporimetry | Does not report on correlation of data obtained from the two devices or intra‐ or inter‐reliability. Measures effect of change of measuring angle. |
| Imhof et al. 61 | Closed chamber TEWL measurement: microclimate, calibration and performance | Review article. |
| Petro and Komor 62 | Correction to absolute values of evaporation rates measured by the Servo‐Med Evaporimeter | Describes adjustments that need to be made to this specific device's TEWL measurements that were previously inaccurate at higher rates of TEWL. Does not include reliability data or comparison to other devices. |
| Valentin et al. 63 | A novel TEWL sensor | No reliability or measurement error data contained within the article. |
| Weigmann et al. 64 | Comparison of TEWL and spectroscopic absorbance to quantify changes of the stratum corneum after tape stripping | Does not include reliability data or comparison to other devices for TEWL measurement. TEWL was used as a measure of SC thickness. |
Abbreviation: TEWL, transepidermal water loss.