Table 1.
The characteristics of included studies.
| Study, yr | PFNA/DHS | Follow-up/mo | Type of study | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sample size | Age (yr) | Gender (male/female) | Fracture type (number) | |||
| Andalib, 2020[12] | 38/55 | 61.45 ± 17.0 64.40 ± 15.5 |
43/50 | A* | 12 | RCT |
| Zehir, 2015[13] | 96/102 | 77.22 ± 6.82 76.86 ± 6.74 |
76/122 | A2.1 49/A2.2 87/A2.3 62 | 6 | RCT |
| Huang, 2015[7] | 30/30 | 75.07 ± 7.87 74.01 ± 7.25 |
32/28 | Evans†III 26/IV 23/V 11 | 12–24 | RCT |
| Sinan, 2014[13] | 96/102 | 77.22 6.82 76.86 6.74 |
76/122 | A2.1 49/A2.2 87/A2.3 62 | 6 | RCT |
| Aktselis, 2014[14] | 36/35 | 82.9 ± 5.8 83.1 ± 6.5 |
15/56 | A2.2-A2.3 | 12 | RCT |
| Chua, 2013[15] | 25/38 | 75 77 |
31/32 | A2 50/A3 11 | 12 | RS |
| Li, 2013[16] | 42/50 | 72.8 ± 5.8 72.5 ± 5.3 |
49/43 | EvansII34/IIB 38/III 14/R 6 | 10–18 | RS |
| Wang, 2018[17] | 90/68 | 74 ± 14 74 ± 11 |
57/101 | EvansIIA 85/IIB63/III10 | 6–18 | RS |
| Lu, 2019[18] | 45/38 | 88.35 ± 6.12 88.77 ± 5.52 |
44/39 | EvansIIIA 39/IIIB33/IV11 | 12 | RS |
| Müller, 2020[19] | 200/75 | 82.6 ± 8.00 82.6 ± 8.00 |
42/233 | A2 | 24 | RS |
| Tahir, 2018[20] | 32/30 | 71.6610.59 72.13 ± 9.06 |
29/33 | A2.2-A2.3 | 12 | RS |
| Zhang, 2012[21] | 216/168 | 75.4/73.4 | 181/201 | A2 212/A3 99 | Unclear | RS |
| Yu, 2016[22] | 186/177 | 78.3/77.7 | 153/210 | A2 104/A3 101 | 37–42 | RS |
| Huang, 2012[23] | 43/72 | 72.8 ± 4.9 72.5 ± 5.5 |
32/83 | A2 69 | 6–36 | RS |
Data are presented as n or mean ± standard deviation.
DHS = dynamic hip screw, PFNA = proximal femoral nail anti-rotation, RCT = randomized controlled trial, RS = retrospective study.
* Arbeitsge-meinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association. † Evans-Jensen classification.