Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 7;2023(2):CD014909. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014909.pub2

Kobayashi 2007.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design: Parallel‐group randomised trials
Duration of trial: May 2001 to December 2004
Duration of follow‐up: 6 weeks
Country of origin: Japan
Participants Baseline characteristics
Number randomised: 491 participants
Number analysed: 484participants
Intervention: MBP+oAB
  • Number of participants [n]: 242

  • Age [years; mean (range)]: 67.9 (31‐92)

  • Gender [male/female; n]: 154/88


Control: MBP
  • Number of participants [n]: 242

  • Age [years, mean (range)]: 69.1 (46‐95)

  • Gender [male/female; n]: 137/105


Inclusion criteria 
"At least 20 years of age and referred for elective surgery for colorectal cancer"
Exclusion criteria
Quote: ""Contraindication to mechanical bowel preparation, known allergy to a penicillin or cephalosporin, treatment with any antibiotic within the past 2 weeks, pregnancy, and evidence of an infection at the time of surgery moderate or severe liver disease (alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, or total bilirubin more than five times the upper limit of normal), or severe renal impairment (serum creatinine >220 µmol/l)"
Baseline imbalances
none
Interventions Comparison
  • Intervention: MBP+oAB

  • Control: MBP


MBP
  • Agent(s): polyethylene glycol

  • Dose per administration: 2000 mL

  • Time(s) of intake: at 10:00, completed by 14:00, on the day before surgery

  • Route: oral

  • Concomitant medications: ‐


oAB
  • Agent(s): kanamycin and erythromycin

  • Dose per administration: 1000 mg and 400 mg

  • Time(s) of intake: at 14:00, 15:00, and 23:00 h on the day before surgery

  • Route: oral

  • Concomitant medications: ‐


Perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis
  • Agent(s): cefmetazole

  • Dose per administration: 1 g

  • Time(s) of intake:Quote: " "after the induction of anesthesia, and an additional dose if the operation was prolonged beyond 3 h, and cefmetazole was administered again twice daily for 3 consecutive days after the operation"


Adherence to regimen: ‐
Outcomes Outcomes sought in review and reported in trial
  • SSI (superficial and organ/space)


Outcomes sought but not reported in trial
  • Anastomotic leakage

  • Mortality

  • Postoperative complications (mild D/C I + II or severe D/C III+IV)

  • Incidence of postoperative ileus

  • Length of hospital stay

  • Side effects of Intervention(s)


Outcomes reported in trial but not used in review
  • SSI according to the surgical procedure (colon vs. rectum)

Notes Source of funding:
Conflicts of interest:
Ethics approval: "The study was approved by the ethics boards of the participating centers."
Informed consent: "Written informed consent was required"
Clinical trials registration:
Sample size calculation: "On the basis of an SSI rate of 11% at the last evaluable follow‐up assessment for both treatment groups, a power of 0.80, and the requirement to show that intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis was noninferior to oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis with a δ of 8%, a total sample size of 482 patients (241 assigned to intravenous anti microbial prophylaxis, and 241 assigned to oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis) satisfying the criteria for the intention‐to‐treat population was calculated to be required. Taking into account an estimated ineligibility rate before the start of the study of 5%, a total of about 500 patients was thus considered to be needed."