Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 8;43(6):993–1007. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1672-22.2022

Table 1.

Comparison of visual detection for light and dark stimuli at different contrast ranges

Eccentricity (°) Contrast range (%) Contrast polarity All errors (%) Mislocation errors (%) Missed targets (%) Reaction time (ms)
5–30 5–20 Darks 16.08 ± 12.89 7.68 ± 7.25 8.40 ± 10.49 682.5 ± 119.6
Lights 17.37 ± 12.90 7.80 ± 6.84 9.58 ± 10.93 689.7 ± 119.2
p value p < 0.00001 p = 0.1652 p < 0.00001 p = 0.00042
5 Darks 34.86 ± 14.82 15.96 ± 10.99 18.90 ± 17.44 815.4 ± 136.4
Lights 32.42 ± 14.25 14.50 ± 10.16 17.93 ± 16.89 804.2 ± 130.6
p value p = 0.0035 p = 0.0077 p = 0.3263 p = 0.0426
10–20 Darks 8.45 ± 6.31 4.38 ± 3.44 4.07 ± 4.58 627.8 ± 87.3
Lights 11.22 ± 8.61 5.13 ± 4.06 6.86 ± 6.67 647.3 ± 96.6
p value p < 0.00001 p = 0.00039 p < 0.00001 p < 0.00001

From left to right, eccentricity range (all measurements averaged across all eccentricities), contrast range (measurements averaged across 5–20%, 5%, or 10–20% contrast), contrast polarity (dark or light), errors (all, mislocation, missed), and reaction times. The numbers within each cell are mean ± SD and p values that show there is no difference between darks and lights. Significant p values (<0.05) are highlighted in bold.