Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 1;2023:4662440. doi: 10.1155/2023/4662440

Table 2.

Comparison of relative gene expression profiles among study groups.

Variables Formaldehydea Formaldehyde + curcuminb Shamc Controld P value
FSHR 1.29 ± 0.45 1.14 ± 0.31 1.28 ± 0.81 1.02 ± 0.15 0.64

GDF-9 1.3 ± 0.42 1.03 ± 0.14 0.99 ± 0.5 1.01 ± 0.52 0.84

KL 3.05 ± 0.75 2.4 ± 0.85 0.87 ± 0.22 0.81 ± 0.33 0.06
0.6a,b
0.03a,c
0.03a,d
0.19b,c
0.34b,d
0.9c,d

FIGLA 0.91 ± 0.36 1.44 ± 0.45 3.07 ± 0.34 3.59 ± 0.55 0.006
0.44a,b
0.009a,c
0.02a,d
0.02b,c
0.01b,d
0.99c,d

BAX 1.18 ± 0.35 1.15 ± 0.24 0.74 ± 0.11 1.1 ± 0.33 0.58

BCL-2 0.99 ± 0.26 1.01 ± 0.2 2.94 ± 0.74 2.94 ± 0.42 0.007
0.91a,b
0.03a,c
0.02a,d
0.01b,c
0.09b,d
0.73c,d

BAX/BCL-2 1.14 1.03 1.11 1.00

FSHR: follicle-stimulating hormone receptor, GDF-9: growth differentiation factor-9, FIGLA: factor in germ line alpha, Kl: klotho, BCL-2: B-cell lymphoma 2, and BAX: BCL-2-like protein 4. The data were shown as the mean ± SEM. The Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were carried out, respectively, to compare two and all groups. SEM: standard error of mean. P < 0.05 was considered as bold values.