Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Suicide Res. 2022 Aug 9;27(3):1034–1046. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2022.2106923

Table 2.

Interventions Endorsed

Endorsed Practices Total sample
(n = 771)
Mental Health
Clinicians
(n = 613)
Mental Health
Allies
(n = 158)
Evidence-Based Interventions 656 (85.1%) 550 (89.7%) ** 106 (67.1%) **
Crisis Response Plan (CRP) 356 (46.2%) 292 (47.6%) 64 (40.5%)
Safety Plan Intervention (SPI) 610 (79.1%) 520 (84.8) 90 (57.0%)
Any Evidence-Based Intervention + Any Contraindicated Intervention1 274 (41.8%) 230 (41.8%) 44 (41.5%)
Contraindicated Interventions 287 (37.2%) 242 (39.5%) * 45 (28.5%) *
Contracting for Safety 256 (33.2%) 218 (35.6%) 38 (24.1%)
No-harm Contract 112 (14.5%) 92 (15.0%) 20 (12.7%)
No-suicide Contract 97 (12.6%) 84 (13.7%) 13 (8.2%)
Hospitalization 480 (62.3%) 430 (70.1%) ** 50 (31.6%) **

Note. Differences were tested using chi-square analyses for only the overarching categories (i.e., Evidence-based Interventions, Contraindicated Interventions, and Hospitalization). Differences are noted by * = p<.05 & ** = p<.001.

1

This subset sample was 656 individuals who endorsed using at least one evidence-based intervention and at least on contraindicated intervention. This included 550 mental health clinicians and 106 mental health allies.